Literature DB >> 19047415

Coalescence times and FST under a skewed offspring distribution among individuals in a population.

Bjarki Eldon1, John Wakeley.   

Abstract

Estimates of gene flow between subpopulations based on F(ST) (or N(ST)) are shown to be confounded by the reproduction parameters of a model of skewed offspring distribution. Genetic evidence of population subdivision can be observed even when gene flow is very high, if the offspring distribution is skewed. A skewed offspring distribution arises when individuals can have very many offspring with some probability. This leads to high probability of identity by descent within subpopulations and results in genetic heterogeneity between subpopulations even when Nm is very large. Thus, we consider a limiting model in which the rates of coalescence and migration can be much higher than for a Wright-Fisher population. We derive the densities of pairwise coalescence times and expressions for F(ST) and other statistics under both the finite island model and a many-demes limit model. The results can explain the observed genetic heterogeneity among subpopulations of certain marine organisms despite substantial gene flow.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19047415      PMCID: PMC2644951          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.094342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  30 in total

Review 1.  Inbreeding and relatedness coefficients: what do they measure?

Authors:  F Rousset
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Male reproductive competition in spawning aggregations of cod (Gadus morhua, L.).

Authors:  D Bekkevold; M M Hansen; V Loeschcke
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  Dispersal barriers and isolation among deep-sea mussel populations (Mytilidae: Bathymodiolus) from eastern Pacific hydrothermal vents.

Authors:  Y Won; C R Young; R A Lutz; R C Vrijenhoek
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Distribution of nucleotide differences between two randomly chosen cistrons in a subdivided population: the finite island model.

Authors:  W H Li
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  The genetical structure of populations.

Authors:  S WRIGHT
Journal:  Ann Eugen       Date:  1951-03

7.  Average number of nucleotide differences in a sample from a single subpopulation: a test for population subdivision.

Authors:  C Strobeck
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Current versus historical population sizes in vertebrate species with high gene flow: a comparison based on mitochondrial DNA lineages and inbreeding theory for neutral mutations.

Authors:  J C Avise; R M Ball; J Arnold
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  A genomic scan for divergent selection in a secondary contact zone between Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico oysters, Crassostrea virginica.

Authors:  Maria C Murray; Matthew P Hare
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Directional dispersal between mid-ocean ridges: deep-ocean circulation and gene flow in Ridgeia piscesae.

Authors:  C R Young; S Fujio; R C Vrijenhoek
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  21 in total

1.  Dynamics of neutral and selected alleles when the offspring distribution is skewed.

Authors:  Ricky Der; Charles Epstein; Joshua B Plotkin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Mixed transmission modes and dynamic genome evolution in an obligate animal-bacterial symbiosis.

Authors:  Shelbi L Russell; Russell B Corbett-Detig; Colleen M Cavanaugh
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  On selection in finite populations.

Authors:  Chai Molina; David J D Earn
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.259

4.  Inferring Demography and Selection in Organisms Characterized by Skewed Offspring Distributions.

Authors:  Andrew M Sackman; Rebecca B Harris; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  On the eigenvalue effective size of structured populations.

Authors:  Ola Hössjer
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 6.  Coalescent inferences in conservation genetics: should the exception become the rule?

Authors:  Valeria Montano
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 7.  On the importance of skewed offspring distributions and background selection in virus population genetics.

Authors:  K K Irwin; S Laurent; S Matuszewski; S Vuilleumier; L Ormond; H Shim; C Bank; J D Jensen
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Consequences of a poecilogonous life history for genetic structure in coastal populations of the polychaete Streblospio benedicti.

Authors:  Christina Zakas; John P Wares
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Evaluating the Ryman-Laikre effect for marine stock enhancement and aquaculture.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Kjetil Hindar; Sten Karlsson; Jeffrey J Hard
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.624

10.  Reference-free population genomics from next-generation transcriptome data and the vertebrate-invertebrate gap.

Authors:  Philippe Gayral; José Melo-Ferreira; Sylvain Glémin; Nicolas Bierne; Miguel Carneiro; Benoit Nabholz; Joao M Lourenco; Paulo C Alves; Marion Ballenghien; Nicolas Faivre; Khalid Belkhir; Vincent Cahais; Etienne Loire; Aurélien Bernard; Nicolas Galtier
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.