PURPOSE: We conducted a cooperative group phase II study to assess antitumor activity and toxicity of sorafenib in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who had received prior treatment for their disease. PATIENT AND METHODS: Patients were eligible if they had measurable disease and had previously received an anthracycline and/or a taxane in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or metastatic setting. The primary end point of the study was tumor response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). The study was designed in two stages. Sorafenib was administered as 400 mg twice daily on days 1 through 28 of each 4-week cycle. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were enrolled with a median age of 54 years (range, 37 to 70 years). Twenty-two (96%) had prior anthracycline treatment and 16 (70%) had prior taxane treatment. Patients received sorafenib for a median of two cycles (range, one to 15 cycles) with a median follow-up of 2.4 years (range, 2.2 to 2.6 years). There were no grade 4 toxicities and few grade 3 toxicities. Among the 20 patients eligible for efficacy analysis, no patients experienced a partial response or complete response per RECIST criteria. Thus, the trial stopped at the end of the first stage per study design. Two patients (10%; 90% CI, 1.8% to 28.3%) achieved stable disease lasting longer than 6 months. CONCLUSION: Sorafenib as a single agent, although well tolerated, did not exhibit activity when measured by tumor shrinkage in patients with MBC who had received prior treatment. Further research should focus on combinations with standard therapy and end points more sensitive to effects of targeted agents, such as disease stabilization.
PURPOSE: We conducted a cooperative group phase II study to assess antitumor activity and toxicity of sorafenib in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who had received prior treatment for their disease. PATIENT AND METHODS: Patients were eligible if they had measurable disease and had previously received an anthracycline and/or a taxane in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or metastatic setting. The primary end point of the study was tumor response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). The study was designed in two stages. Sorafenib was administered as 400 mg twice daily on days 1 through 28 of each 4-week cycle. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were enrolled with a median age of 54 years (range, 37 to 70 years). Twenty-two (96%) had prior anthracycline treatment and 16 (70%) had prior taxane treatment. Patients received sorafenib for a median of two cycles (range, one to 15 cycles) with a median follow-up of 2.4 years (range, 2.2 to 2.6 years). There were no grade 4 toxicities and few grade 3 toxicities. Among the 20 patients eligible for efficacy analysis, no patients experienced a partial response or complete response per RECIST criteria. Thus, the trial stopped at the end of the first stage per study design. Two patients (10%; 90% CI, 1.8% to 28.3%) achieved stable disease lasting longer than 6 months. CONCLUSION:Sorafenibas a single agent, although well tolerated, did not exhibit activity when measured by tumor shrinkage in patients with MBC who had received prior treatment. Further research should focus on combinations with standard therapy and end points more sensitive to effects of targeted agents, such as disease stabilization.
Authors: Els Lierman; Idoya Lahortiga; Helen Van Miegroet; Nicole Mentens; Peter Marynen; Jan Cools Journal: Haematologica Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Scott Wilhelm; Christopher Carter; Mark Lynch; Timothy Lowinger; Jacques Dumas; Roger A Smith; Brian Schwartz; Ronit Simantov; Susan Kelley Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 84.694
Authors: Bernard Escudier; Tim Eisen; Walter M Stadler; Cezary Szczylik; Stéphane Oudard; Michael Siebels; Sylvie Negrier; Christine Chevreau; Ewa Solska; Apurva A Desai; Frédéric Rolland; Tomasz Demkow; Thomas E Hutson; Martin Gore; Scott Freeman; Brian Schwartz; Minghua Shan; Ronit Simantov; Ronald M Bukowski Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-01-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michelle D Althuis; Jaclyn M Dozier; William F Anderson; Susan S Devesa; Louise A Brinton Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2005-02-28 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Christine Elser; Lillian L Siu; Eric Winquist; Mark Agulnik; Gregory R Pond; Soo F Chin; Peggy Francis; Robin Cheiken; James Elting; Angela McNabola; Dean Wilkie; Oana Petrenciuc; Eric X Chen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-08-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Melody A Cobleigh; Virginia K Langmuir; George W Sledge; Kathy D Miller; Latrice Haney; William F Novotny; James D Reimann; Amy Vassel Journal: Semin Oncol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.929
Authors: Claudine Isaacs; Pia Herbolsheimer; Minetta C Liu; Mary Wilkinson; Yvonne Ottaviano; Gina G Chung; Robert Warren; Jennifer Eng-Wong; Philip Cohen; Karen L Smith; Karen Creswell; Antonella Novielli; Rebecca Slack Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2010-10-26 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Sara K Taylor; Stephen Chia; Susan Dent; Mark Clemons; Mark Agulnik; Pamela Grenci; Lisa Wang; Amit M Oza; Percy Ivy; Kathleen I Pritchard; Natasha B Leighl Journal: Oncologist Date: 2010-08-03
Authors: Bruno Vincenzi; Daniele Santini; Antonio Russo; Raffaele Addeo; Francesco Giuliani; Liliana Montella; Sergio Rizzo; Olga Venditti; Anna Maria Frezza; Michele Caraglia; Giuseppe Colucci; Salvatore Del Prete; Giuseppe Tonini Journal: Oncologist Date: 2010-01-05