PURPOSE:Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) leads to significantly fewer symptomatic brain metastases and improved survival. Detailed effects of PCI on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) are reported here. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (age, 18 to 75 years; WHO < or = 2) with ED-SCLC, and any response to chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to either observation or PCI. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and patient-reported symptoms were secondary end points. The European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer core HRQOL tool (Quality of Life Questionnaire C30) and brain module (Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Cancer Module) were used to collect self-reported patient data. Six HRQOL scales were selected as primary HRQOL end points: global health status; hair loss; fatigue; and role, cognitive and emotional functioning. Assessments were performed at random assignment, 6 weeks, 3 months, and then 3-monthly up to 1 year and 6-monthly thereafter. RESULTS:Compliance with the HRQOL assessment was 93.7% at baseline and dropped to 60% at 6 weeks. Short-term results up to 3 months showed that there was a negative impact of PCI on selected HRQOL scales. The largest mean difference between the two arms was observed for fatigue and hair loss. The impact of PCI on global health status as well as on functioning scores was more limited. For global health status, the observed mean difference was eight points on a scale 0 to 100 at 6 weeks (P = .018) and 3 months (P = .055). CONCLUSION:PCI should be offered to all responding ED SCLC patients. Patients should be informed of the potential adverse effects from PCI. Clinicians should be alert to these; monitor their patients; and offer appropriate support, clinical, and psychosocial care.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) leads to significantly fewer symptomatic brain metastases and improved survival. Detailed effects of PCI on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) are reported here. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (age, 18 to 75 years; WHO < or = 2) with ED-SCLC, and any response to chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to either observation or PCI. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and patient-reported symptoms were secondary end points. The European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer core HRQOL tool (Quality of Life Questionnaire C30) and brain module (Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Cancer Module) were used to collect self-reported patient data. Six HRQOL scales were selected as primary HRQOL end points: global health status; hair loss; fatigue; and role, cognitive and emotional functioning. Assessments were performed at random assignment, 6 weeks, 3 months, and then 3-monthly up to 1 year and 6-monthly thereafter. RESULTS: Compliance with the HRQOL assessment was 93.7% at baseline and dropped to 60% at 6 weeks. Short-term results up to 3 months showed that there was a negative impact of PCI on selected HRQOL scales. The largest mean difference between the two arms was observed for fatigue and hair loss. The impact of PCI on global health status as well as on functioning scores was more limited. For global health status, the observed mean difference was eight points on a scale 0 to 100 at 6 weeks (P = .018) and 3 months (P = .055). CONCLUSION: PCI should be offered to all responding ED SCLCpatients. Patients should be informed of the potential adverse effects from PCI. Clinicians should be alert to these; monitor their patients; and offer appropriate support, clinical, and psychosocial care.
Authors: A Gregor; A Cull; R J Stephens; J A Kirkpatrick; J R Yarnold; D J Girling; F R Macbeth; R Stout; D Machin Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1997-10 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: P E Postmus; H Haaxma-Reiche; E F Smit; H J Groen; H Karnicka; T Lewinski; J van Meerbeeck; M Clerico; A Gregor; D Curran; T Sahmoud; A Kirkpatrick; G Giaccone Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-10-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: R Arriagada; T Le Chevalier; F Borie; A Rivière; P Chomy; I Monnet; A Tardivon; F Viader; M Tarayre; S Benhamou Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1995-02-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: N K Aaronson; S Ahmedzai; B Bergman; M Bullinger; A Cull; N J Duez; A Filiberti; H Flechtner; S B Fleishman; J C de Haes Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1993-03-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: A P Meert; M Paesmans; T Berghmans; B Martin; C Mascaux; F Vallot; J M Verdebout; J J Lafitte; J P Sculier Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2001-06-19 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: L Kepka; D Tyc-Szczepaniak; K Osowiecka; A Sprawka; B Trąbska-Kluch; B Czeremszynska Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2017-06-14 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: N Rodriguez de Dios; P Calvo; M Rico; M Martín; F Couñago; A Sotoca; B Taboada; A Rodríguez Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Brandi R Page; Edward G Shaw; Lingyi Lu; David Bryant; David Grisell; Glenn J Lesser; Drew C Monitto; Michelle J Naughton; Stephen R Rapp; Steven R Savona; Sunjay Shah; Doug Case; Michael D Chan Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2015-05-12 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Ahsan S Farooqi; Emma B Holliday; Pamela K Allen; Xiong Wei; James D Cox; Ritsuko Komaki Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2017-01-07 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Vinai Gondi; Rebecca Paulus; Deborah W Bruner; Christina A Meyers; Elizabeth M Gore; Aaron Wolfson; Maria Werner-Wasik; Alexander Y Sun; Hak Choy; Benjamin Movsas Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2013-04-15 Impact factor: 7.038