Literature DB >> 19047118

Polymorphisms in cyclooxygenase-2 and epidermal growth factor receptor are associated with progression-free survival independent of K-ras in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with single-agent cetuximab.

Georg Lurje1, Fumio Nagashima, Wu Zhang, Dongyun Yang, Heung M Chang, Michael A Gordon, Anthony El-Khoueiry, Hatim Husain, Peter M Wilson, Robert D Ladner, David J Mauro, Christiane Langer, Eric K Rowinsky, Heinz-Josef Lenz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recently, an objective response rate of 12% was reported in a phase II study of cetuximab in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based chemotherapy (IMC-0144). In this large molecular correlates study, we tested whether K-ras mutation status and polymorphisms in genes involved in the EGFR-signaling pathway were associated with clinical outcome in IMC-0144. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We analyzed all available tissue samples from 130 of 346 mCRC patients enrolled in the IMC-0144 phase II clinical trial of cetuximab. Genomic DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissues, and K-ras mutation status and the genotypes were analyzed using PCR-RFLP, direct DNA-sequencing, and 5'-end [gamma-33P] ATP-labeled PCR-protocols.
RESULTS: The PFS of patients with cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) -765 G>C [C/C; risk ratio (RR), 0.31; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.12-0.84; P = 0.032], COX-2 +8473 T>C (C/C; RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.40-1.13; P = 0.003), EGF +61 A>G (G/G; RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34-0.95; P = 0.042), and EGFR +497 G>A (A/G; RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.56-1.20; P = 0.017) genotypes was significantly longer compared with those with other genotypes. In addition, patients whose tumors did not have K-ras mutations showed better RR, PFS, and overall survival than patients with K-ras mutations. In multivariable analysis, COX-2 +8473 T>C (adjusted P = 0.013) and EGFR +497 G>A (adjusted P = 0.010) remained significantly associated with progression-free survival, independent of skin rash toxicity, K-ras mutation status, and Eastern Cooperative Group performance status.
CONCLUSIONS: Polymorphisms in COX-2 and EGFR may be useful independent molecular markers to predict clinical outcome in patients with mCRC treated with single-agent cetuximab, independent of skin rash toxicity, K-ras mutation, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19047118     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  48 in total

1.  RIPK1 and CASP7 polymorphism as prognostic markers for survival in patients with colorectal cancer after complete resection.

Authors:  Yee Soo Chae; Jong Gwang Kim; Sang Kyun Sohn; Su Jeong Lee; Byung Woog Kang; Joon Ho Moon; Jae Yong Park; Seong Woo Jeon; Han-Ik Bae; Gyu Seog Choi; Soo-Han Jun
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Cyclooxygenase-2 and cancer treatment: understanding the risk should be worth the reward.

Authors:  David G Menter; Richard L Schilsky; Raymond N DuBois
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Accomplishments in 2008 in the treatment of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Richard M Goldberg; Neal J Meropol; Josep Tabernero
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09

4.  Genes involved in pericyte-driven tumor maturation predict treatment benefit of first-line FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  N B Volz; S Stintzing; W Zhang; D Yang; Y Ning; T Wakatsuki; R E El-Khoueiry; J E Li; A Kardosh; F Loupakis; C Cremolini; A Falcone; S J Scherer; H-J Lenz
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 3.550

5.  Combined assessment of EGFR-related molecules to predict outcome of 1st-line cetuximab-containing chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yu Sunakawa; Dongyun Yang; Miriana Moran; Stephanie H Astrow; Akihito Tsuji; Craig Stephens; Wu Zhang; Shu Cao; Takehiro Takahashi; Tadamichi Denda; Ken Shimada; Mitsugu Kochi; Masato Nakamura; Masahito Kotaka; Yoshihiko Segawa; Toshiki Masuishi; Masahiro Takeuchi; Masashi Fujii; Toshifusa Nakajima; Wataru Ichikawa; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.742

6.  Circulating tumor cells in gastrointestinal malignancies: current techniques and clinical implications.

Authors:  Georg Lurje; Marc Schiesser; Andreas Claudius; Paul Magnus Schneider
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 4.375

7.  KRAS mutational analysis for colorectal cancer. Application: pharmacogenomic.

Authors:  Grace Wang; Robin K Kelley
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2010-09-02

8.  Polymorphisms in arachidonic acid metabolism-related genes and the risk and prognosis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shuying Li; Xiaojuan Zhao; Zhiwei Wu; Ye Li; Lin Zhu; Binbin Cui; Xinshu Dong; Suli Tian; Fulan Hu; Yashuang Zhao
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  KRAS Testing for Anti-EGFR Therapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: An Evidence-Based and Economic Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-12-01

10.  Genetic variations in angiogenesis pathway genes associated with clinical outcome in localized gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  G Lurje; H Husain; D G Power; D Yang; S Groshen; A Pohl; W Zhang; Y Ning; P C Manegold; A El-Khoueiry; S Iqbal; L H Tang; M A Shah; H-J Lenz
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.