Literature DB >> 19046734

Cranioplasty using polymethyl methacrylate prostheses.

Sai-Cheung Lee1, Chieh-Tsai Wu, Shih-Tseng Lee, Po-Jen Chen.   

Abstract

In this retrospective study we attempted to assess the clinical performance of prefabricated polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) prostheses and to determine whether they outperform intra-operatively moulded PMMA prostheses in reducing operating time, blood loss and surgical complications in elective delayed cranioplasty operations, after decompressive craniectomy, to repair large (> 100 cm2) cranial defects. Patients (n=131) were divided into three groups according to the cranioplasty technique used. Group 1 patients received fresh frozen autograft bone that had been removed at the craniectomy and refrigerated at -80 degrees C. Group 2 included patients whose PMMA prosthesis was moulded intra-operatively. Group 3 patients received a custom-made prefabricated PMMA prosthesis manufactured using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM). Group 2 patients required significantly more operating time than both group 1 (p<0.001) and group 3 (p<0.001) patients, but operating time did not differ significantly between groups 1 and 3 (p>0.05). Mean intra-operative blood loss was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (p=0.015) but did not differ significantly between group 1 and group 3 (p>0.05). The infection rate associated with prefabricated PMMA prostheses was lower than that for intra-operatively moulded PMMA prostheses and was comparable to that for autograft bone flaps. A CAD/CAM PMMA prosthesis is an excellent alternative when no autogenous bone graft harvested during craniectomy is available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19046734     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2008.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  39 in total

Review 1.  Stereolithographic bone scaffold design parameters: osteogenic differentiation and signal expression.

Authors:  Kyobum Kim; Andrew Yeatts; David Dean; John P Fisher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of cranial defect using active contour model and image registration.

Authors:  Yuan-Lin Liao; Chia-Feng Lu; Yung-Nien Sun; Chieh-Tsai Wu; Jiann-Der Lee; Shih-Tseng Lee; Yu-Te Wu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Cranioplasty for large-sized calvarial defects in the pediatric population: a review.

Authors:  Sandi Lam; Justin Kuether; Abigail Fong; Russell Reid
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-11-20

4.  A technique for intraoperative creation of patient-specific titanium mesh implants.

Authors:  Ian Rp Sunderland; Glenn Edwards; James Mainprize; Oleh Antonyshyn
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.947

Review 5.  Complications Associated with Decompressive Craniectomy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  David B Kurland; Ariana Khaladj-Ghom; Jesse A Stokum; Brianna Carusillo; Jason K Karimy; Volodymyr Gerzanich; Juan Sahuquillo; J Marc Simard
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  Microwave sintering and in vitro study of defect-free stable porous multilayered HAp-ZrO2 artificial bone scaffold.

Authors:  Dong-Woo Jang; Thi-Hiep Nguyen; Swapan Kumar Sarkar; Byong-Taek Lee
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 8.090

Review 7.  Problems of reconstructive cranioplasty after traumatic brain injury in children.

Authors:  Paolo Frassanito; Gianpiero Tamburrini; Luca Massimi; Simone Peraio; Massimo Caldarelli; Concezio Di Rocco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Temporal changes in CT perfusion values before and after cranioplasty in patients without symptoms related to external decompression: a pilot study.

Authors:  Silvio Sarubbo; Francesco Latini; Stefano Ceruti; Arturo Chieregato; Christopher d'Esterre; Ting-Yim Lee; Michele Cavallo; Enrico Fainardi
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Using three-dimensional multigrid-based snake and multiresolution image registration for reconstruction of cranial defect.

Authors:  Yuan-Lin Liao; Chia-Feng Lu; Chieh-Tsai Wu; Jiann-Der Lee; Shih-Tseng Lee; Yung-Nien Sun; Yu-Te Wu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Customized cranioplasty implants using three-dimensional printers and polymethyl-methacrylate casting.

Authors:  Bum-Joon Kim; Ki-Sun Hong; Kyung-Jae Park; Dong-Hyuk Park; Yong-Gu Chung; Shin-Hyuk Kang
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.