Literature DB >> 19046696

[Isokinetic assessment with two years follow-up of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstring tendons].

J Condouret1, J Cohn, J-M Ferret, A Lemonsu, W Vasconcelos, D Dejour, J-F Potel.   

Abstract

This retrospective multicentric study was designed to assess the outcome of quadriceps and hamstrings muscles two years after Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction and compare muscles recovery depending on the type of graft and individual variables like age, gender, level of sport, but also in terms of discomfort, pain and functional score. The results focused on the subjective and objective IKDC scores, SF36, the existence or not of subjective disorders and their location. The review included isokinetic muscle tests concentric and eccentric extensors/flexors but also internal rotators/external rotators with analysis of mean work and mean power. One hundred and twenty-seven patients were included with an average age 29 years (+/-10). They all had an ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstring tendon with single or double bundles. In the serie, the average muscles deficit at two years was 10% for the flexors and extensors but with a significant dispersion. Significant differences were not noted in the mean values of all parameters in term of sex or age (over 30 years or not), neither the type of sport, nor of clinical assessment (Class A and B of objective IKDC score), nor the existence of anterior knee pain. There was a relationship between the level of extensor or flexor recovery and the quality of functional results with minimal muscle deficits close to 5% if the IKDC score was over 90 and deficits falling to 15% in the group with IKDC score less than 90. The type of reconstruction (patellar tendon versus hamstrings) had an influence on the muscle deficit. For extensors, the recovery was the same in the two groups, more than 90% at two years and the distribution of these two populations by level of deficit was quite the same. For flexors, residual deficits were significantly higher in the hamstrings group on the three studied parameters whatever the speed and the type of contraction (concentric or eccentric) with an average deficit of 14 to 18%, while, in the patellar tendon group, there was a dominance over the opposite side of 2 to 3% in concentric contraction. The hamstrings deficit appears to be "harvest dependent". For internal rotators, a significantly higher deficit is observed in eccentric contraction for the hamstrings group. The residual hamstrings deficits were related to the number of tendons harvested: -7% when there was no harvest, 7% with one tendon harvested and 17% with two tendons harvested. The relationship between the level of recovery of the quadriceps muscle and hamstrings at two years and the quality of functional results incite, regarding the significantly higher deficit of flexors in ACL reconstructions with hamstrings, to change the rehabilitation programs and especially on early rehabilitation of hamstrings in eccentric mode in the early weeks postoperative considering the harvest site as an equivalent of muscle tear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19046696     DOI: 10.1016/j.rco.2008.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot        ISSN: 0035-1040


  10 in total

1.  Knee pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation of a rehabilitation protocol.

Authors:  F Gadea; D Monnot; B Quélard; R Mortati; M Thaunat; J M Fayard; B Sonnery-Cottet
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-06-07

2.  Clinical, functional, and isokinetic study of a prospective series of anterior cruciate ligament ligamentoplasty with pedicular hamstrings.

Authors:  David Bahlau; Henri Favreau; David Eichler; Sébastien Lustig; François Bonnomet; Matthieu Ehlinger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The incidence of trochlear dysplasia in anterior cruciate ligament tears.

Authors:  Panagiotis G Ntagiopoulos; Nicolas Bonin; Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet; Roger Badet; David Dejour
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Comparative study between mono-bundle bone-patellar tendon-bone, double-bundle hamstring and mono-bundle bone-patellar tendon-bone combined with a modified Lemaire extra-articular procedure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  David Dejour; Wilson Vanconcelos; Nicolas Bonin; Paulo Renato Fernandes Saggin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-11-25       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction best practice: A review of graft choice.

Authors:  Daniel A Shaerf; Philip S Pastides; Khaled M Sarraf; Charles A Willis-Owen
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-01-18

6.  Comparison of knee extensor strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using either quadriceps tendon or hamstring tendon autografts.

Authors:  C Horteur; B Rubens Duval; A Merlin; J Cognault; M Ollivier; R Pailhe
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-06-21

7.  Correlation of Isokinetic Testing and ACL Failure With the Short Graft Tape Suspension Technique at Six Months.

Authors:  Mathieu Severyns; Stéphane Plawecki; Guillaume-Anthony Odri; Tanguy Vendeuvre; Frédéric Depiesse; Jean-Francois Flez; Louis-Antoine Liguori
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-06

8.  Effect of Concomitant Meniscal Tear on Strength and Functional Performance in Young Athletes 6 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Autograft.

Authors:  Lauren H Redler; Dai Sugimoto; Ashley J Bassett; Mininder S Kocher; Lyle J Micheli; Benton E Heyworth
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-11-02

Review 9.  Partial tearing of the anterior cruciate ligament: diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Eduardo Frois Temponi; Lúcio Honório de Carvalho Júnior; Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet; Pierre Chambat
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-02-14

10.  Anterior Knee Pain After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Fabiano da Silva Marques; Pedro Henrique Borges Barbosa; Pedro Rodrigues Alves; Sandro Zelada; Rodrigo Pereira da Silva Nunes; Marcio Régis de Souza; Márcio do Amaral Camargo Pedro; José Francisco Nunes; Wilson Mello Alves; Gustavo Constantino de Campos
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-10-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.