Literature DB >> 19046471

Comparative evaluation of conventional versus endoscopic septoplasty for limited septal deviation and spur.

R Bothra1, N N Mathur.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the procedure, results and complications of conventional septoplasty with those of endoscopic septoplasty, in cases of limited septal deviation and septal spurs.
DESIGN: Prospective study; interventional type; randomised block design; comparative clinical trial.
METHODS: We included in the study 80 patients presenting with limited septal deviation, septal spur with nasal obstruction, or deviated septum with septal correction was required in order to access the ostio-meatal complex (OMC) for functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Of these 12 were children with septal deviation producing significant nasal obstruction. All patients were divided into two groups- with one undergoing conventional and the other endoscopic septoplasty. Post-operative assessment was carried out one month, three months and one to two years after the procedure. RESULT: Post-operative complications such as haemorrhage, infraorbital oedema, nasal pain and in-patient hospital was slightly more in the conventional septoplasty group.
CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference was found between the conventional and endoscopic septoplasty groups, as assessed by subjective and objective evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19046471     DOI: 10.1017/S0022215108004192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  7 in total

1.  Mitomycin-C in Post-endoscopic Septoplasty Synechiae: Does it Really Helps?

Authors:  Abu Sayeed; Mehtab Alam; Satish Chandra Sharma; Syed Abrar Hasan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-09-19

2.  Endoscopic versus conventional septoplasty: objective/subjective data on 276 patients.

Authors:  Massimiliano Garzaro; Valeria Dell'Era; Giuseppe Riva; Luca Raimondo; Giancarlo Pecorari; Paolo Aluffi Valletti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  A comparative study of endoscopic septoplasty versus conventional septoplasty.

Authors:  D C Sathyaki; Chary Geetha; G B Munishwara; M Mohan; K Manjuanth
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-11-24

Review 4.  Long-term patient-related outcome measures of septoplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chi Lap Nicholas Tsang; Theresa Nguyen; Torunn Sivesind; Anders Cervin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Quality of life before and after septoplasty and rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Ingo Baumann
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-04-27

6.  Effectiveness of endoscopic septoplasty in different types of nasal septal deformities: our experience with NOSE evaluation.

Authors:  G Dell'Aversana Orabona; A Romano; V Abbate; G Salzano; P Piombino; F Farina; A Pansini; G Iaconetta; L Califano
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  Comparison of visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score in evaluation of post septoplasty patients.

Authors:  Radhika Hiren Shukla; Sanjana Vijay Nemade; Kiran Jaywant Shinde
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-04-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.