Literature DB >> 19046015

Comparison of the pharmacokinetic properties of bisoprolol and carvedilol in healthy dogs.

Gerald Beddies1, Philip R Fox, Mark D Papich, Venkata-Rangaro Kanikanti, Ralph Krebber, Bruce W Keene.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacokinetic properties and bioavailability following oral and IV administration of bisoprolol, a second-generation beta1-adrenoceptor-selective blocking agent, with those of carvedilol, a third-generation beta1/beta2 and alpha1-adrenoceptor blocking agent, in dogs. ANIMALS: 12 healthy adult Beagles. PROCEDURES: A prospective, parallel group study was performed. The dogs were allocated to 1 of 2 groups (6 dogs/group) and were administered orally a 1 mg/kg dose of either bisoprolol or carvedilol. Following a 1-week washout period, each cohort received a 1 mg/kg dose of the same drug IV. Blood samples were collected before and after drug administration, and serum concentrations, pharmacokinetic variables, and bioavailability for each agent were assessed.
RESULTS: After oral administration of bisoprolol, the geometric mean value of the area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf) was 2,195 microg/L (coefficient of variation [CV], 15%). After IV administration of bisoprolol, the dose-normalized geometric mean AUCinf was 2,402 microg/L (CV, 19%). Oral bioavailability of bisoprolol was 91.4%. After oral administration of carvedilol, the geometric mean AUCinf was 70 microg/L (CV, 81%). After IV administration of carvedilol, the geometric mean AUCinf was 491 microg/L (CV, 23%). Oral bioavailability of carvedilol was 14.3%. Total body clearance was low (0.42 L/h/kg) for bisoprolol and high (2.0 L/h/kg) for carvedilol. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: After oral administration, carvedilol underwent extensive first-pass metabolism and had limited bioavailability; bisoprolol had less first-pass effect and higher bioavailability. Collectively, these differences suggested that, in dogs, bisoprolol has less interindividual pharmacokinetic variability, compared with carvedilol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19046015     DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.69.12.1659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Vet Res        ISSN: 0002-9645            Impact factor:   1.156


  5 in total

1.  Application of carvedilol in a dog with pseudoephedrine toxicosis-induced tachycardia.

Authors:  Min-Hee Kang; Hee-Myung Park
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 2.  Gut Wall Metabolism. Application of Pre-Clinical Models for the Prediction of Human Drug Absorption and First-Pass Elimination.

Authors:  Christopher R Jones; Oliver J D Hatley; Anna-Lena Ungell; Constanze Hilgendorf; Sheila Annie Peters; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Applying Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) Criteria to Predict Oral Absorption of Drugs in Dogs: Challenges and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Mark G Papich; Marilyn N Martinez
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Effects of Bisoprolol Are Comparable with Carvedilol in Secondary Prevention of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Seung Jin Jun; Kyung Hwan Kim; Myung Ho Jeong; Min Chul Kim; Doo Sun Sim; Young Joon Hong; Ju Han Kim; Myeong Chan Cho; Jei Keon Chae; Hun Sik Park; Jong Sun Park; Young Keun Ahn
Journal:  Chonnam Med J       Date:  2018-05-25

Review 5.  Management of Chronic Congestive Heart Failure Caused by Myxomatous Mitral Valve Disease in Dogs: A Narrative Review from 1970 to 2020.

Authors:  Mara Bagardi; Viola Zamboni; Chiara Locatelli; Alberto Galizzi; Sara Ghilardi; Paola G Brambilla
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.