Literature DB >> 19045929

A simple mass-spring model with roller feet can induce the ground reactions observed in human walking.

Ben R Whittington1, Darryl G Thelen.   

Abstract

It has previously been shown that a bipedal model consisting of a point mass supported by spring limbs can be tuned to simulate periodic human walking. In this study, we incorporated roller feet into the spring-mass model and evaluated the effect of roller radius, impact angle, and limb stiffness on spatiotemporal gait characteristics, ground reactions, and center-of-pressure excursions. We also evaluated the potential of the improved model to predict speed-dependent changes in ground reaction forces and center-of-pressure excursions observed during normal human walking. We were able to find limit cycles that exhibited gait-like motion across a wide spectrum of model parameters. Incorporation of the roller foot (R=0.3 m) reduced the magnitude of peak ground reaction forces and allowed for forward center-of-pressure progression, making the model more consistent with human walking. At a fixed walking speed, increasing the limb impact angle reduced the cadence and prolonged stance duration. Increases in either limb stiffness or impact angle tended to result in more oscillatory vertical ground reactions. Simultaneous modulation of the limb impact angle and limb stiffness was needed to induce speed-related changes in ground reactions that were consistent with those measured during normal human walking, with better quantitative agreement achieved at slower speeds. We conclude that a simple mass-spring model with roller feet can well describe ground reaction forces, and hence center of mass motion, observed during normal human walking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19045929      PMCID: PMC2918273          DOI: 10.1115/1.3005147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  14 in total

1.  The simplest walking model: stability, complexity, and scaling.

Authors:  M Garcia; A Chatterjee; A Ruina; M Coleman
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Quantification of pelvic rotation as a determinant of gait.

Authors:  D C Kerrigan; P O Riley; J L Lelas; U Della Croce
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Energetics of actively powered locomotion using the simplest walking model.

Authors:  Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  The mechanics of running: how does stiffness couple with speed?

Authors:  T A McMahon; G C Cheng
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Spring-mass running: simple approximate solution and application to gait stability.

Authors:  Hartmut Geyer; Andre Seyfarth; Reinhard Blickhan
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2005-02-07       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Efficient bipedal robots based on passive-dynamic walkers.

Authors:  Steve Collins; Andy Ruina; Russ Tedrake; Martijn Wisse
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-02-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Energetic consequences of walking like an inverted pendulum: step-to-step transitions.

Authors:  Arthur D Kuo; J Maxwell Donelan; Andy Ruina
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.230

8.  Compliant leg behaviour explains basic dynamics of walking and running.

Authors:  Hartmut Geyer; Andre Seyfarth; Reinhard Blickhan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The advantages of a rolling foot in human walking.

Authors:  Peter G Adamczyk; Steven H Collins; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Performance of an inverted pendulum model directly applied to normal human gait.

Authors:  Frank L Buczek; Kevin M Cooney; Matthew R Walker; Michael J Rainbow; M Cecilia Concha; James O Sanders
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 2.063

View more
  5 in total

1.  The rotary component of leg force during walking and running.

Authors:  Manish Anand; Justin Seipel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Prediction of Lower Limb Kinetics and Kinematics during Walking by a Single IMU on the Lower Back Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Hyerim Lim; Bumjoon Kim; Sukyung Park
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Predicting ground reaction forces of human gait using a simple bipedal spring-mass model.

Authors:  Michael Mauersberger; Falk Hähnel; Klaus Wolf; Johannes F C Markmiller; Alexander Knorr; Dominik Krumm; Stephan Odenwald
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.653

4.  Simulation of normal and pathological gaits using a fusion knowledge strategy.

Authors:  Fabio Martínez; Christian Cifuentes; Eduardo Romero
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Estimation of Three-Dimensional Lower Limb Kinetics Data during Walking Using Machine Learning from a Single IMU Attached to the Sacrum.

Authors:  Myunghyun Lee; Sukyung Park
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.