Literature DB >> 19045855

Superadiabaticity in magnetic resonance.

Michaël Deschamps1, Gwendal Kervern, Dominique Massiot, Guido Pintacuda, Lyndon Emsley, Philip J Grandinetti.   

Abstract

Adiabaticity plays a central role in modern magnetic resonance experiments, as excitations with adiabatic Hamiltonians allow precise control of the dynamics of the spin states during the course of an experiment. Surprisingly, many commonly used adiabatic processes in magnetic resonance perform well even though the adiabatic approximation does not appear to hold throughout the process. Here we show that this discrepancy can now be explained through the use of Berry's superadiabatic formalism, which provides a framework for including the finite duration of the process in the theoretical and numerical treatments. In this approach, a slow, but finite time-dependent Hamiltonian is iteratively transformed into time-dependent diagonal frames until the most accurate adiabatic approximation is obtained. In the case of magnetic resonance, the magnetization during an adiabatic process of finite duration is not locked to the effective Hamiltonian in the conventional adiabatic frame, but rather to an effective Hamiltonian in a superadiabatic frame. Only in the superadiabatic frame can the true validity of the adiabatic approximation be evaluated, as the inertial forces acting in this frame are the true cause for deviation from adiabaticity and loss of control during the process. Here we present a brief theoretical background of superadiabaticity and illustrate the concept in the context of magnetic resonance with commonly used shaped radio-frequency pulses.

Year:  2008        PMID: 19045855     DOI: 10.1063/1.3012356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  6 in total

1.  Heteronuclear Adiabatic Relaxation Dispersion (HARD) for quantitative analysis of conformational dynamics in proteins.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Traaseth; Fa-An Chao; Larry R Masterson; Silvia Mangia; Michael Garwood; Shalom Michaeli; Burckhard Seelig; Gianluigi Veglia
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Broadband adiabatic inversion pulses for cross polarization in wideline solid-state NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Kristopher J Harris; Adonis Lupulescu; Bryan E G Lucier; Lucio Frydman; Robert W Schurko
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  MRI contrasts in high rank rotating frames.

Authors:  Timo Liimatainen; Hanne Hakkarainen; Silvia Mangia; Janne M J Huttunen; Christine Storino; Djaudat Idiyatullin; Dennis Sorce; Michael Garwood; Shalom Michaeli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  MRI contrast from relaxation along a fictitious field (RAFF).

Authors:  Timo Liimatainen; Dennis J Sorce; Robert O'Connell; Michael Garwood; Shalom Michaeli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Exchange-induced relaxation in the presence of a fictitious field.

Authors:  Dennis J Sorce; Silvia Mangia; Timo Liimatainen; Michael Garwood; Shalom Michaeli
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Low-power broadband solid-state MAS NMR of 14N.

Authors:  Andrew J Pell; Kevin J Sanders; Sebastian Wegner; Guido Pintacuda; Clare P Grey
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2017-05-21       Impact factor: 3.488

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.