Literature DB >> 19043733

Toxicities and pharmacokinetics of subconjunctival injection of liposomal amphotericin B.

Yuichi Kaji1, Erika Yamamoto, Takahiro Hiraoka, Tetsuro Oshika.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The toxicity of conventional formulations of amphotericin B deoxycholate (AmB(DOC)) limits its clinical applications. To reduce the toxicity of AmB(DOC), lipid formulations of amphotericin B (AmB) have been developed and clinically applied. In the present study, we evaluated the ocular toxicity and pharmacokinetics of subconjunctival injection of liposomal AmB.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subconjunctival injection of either AmB(DOC) (containing 1.5 mg of AmB and 1.2 mg of deoxycholate), deoxycholate (1.2 mg), or liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) (containing 1.5 mg of AmB and lipids) was given to white New Zealand rabbits. After 24 hours, toxicities of the drugs were evaluated by slit lamp and histologically. To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of subconjunctival injection of L-AmB, the concentration of the drug in the cornea was evaluated at 4, 12, 24, and 48 hours after subconjunctival injection of L-AmB, with or without corneal epithelial removal.
RESULTS: Subconjunctival injection of AmB(DOC) or deoxycholate alone induced severe corneal and conjunctival edema, with necrosis and infiltration of inflammatory cells. In contrast, subconjunctival injection of L-AmB induced only mild inflammation near the injection site. The concentration of AmB injected in eyes with intact corneal epithelium was 4.93-2.49, 0.63-0.31, 0.15-0.07 microg/g at 4, 12, and 24 hours respectively after the injection of L-AmB. When injected in eyes after corneal epithelial removal, the concentration of AmB was 19.7-9.87, 2.49-1.25, and 1.25-0.63 microg/g at 4, 12, and 24 hours after injection respectively
CONCLUSIONS: Subconjunctival injection of L-AmB has reduced ocular toxicities and gives satisfactory concentrations in corneal stroma compared with conventional AmB(DOC). Subconjunctival injection of L-AmB will be a choice of treatment for mycotic keratitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19043733     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-008-1003-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  12 in total

1.  Measurements of antifungal levels in corneal tissue: a simplified bioassay for amphotericin B.

Authors:  T E Williams; D M O'Day; W S Head; R D Robinson
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  AmBisome: liposomal formulation, structure, mechanism of action and pre-clinical experience.

Authors:  Jill Adler-Moore; Richard T Proffitt
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 3.  Pharmacologic management of keratomycoses.

Authors:  K J Johns; D M O'Day
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.048

Review 4.  AmBisome targeting to fungal infections.

Authors:  J Adler-Moore
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Corneal concentrations following systemic administration of amphotericin B and its lipid preparations in a rabbit model.

Authors:  David Goldblum; Kaspar Rohrer; Beatrice E Frueh; Regula Theurillat; Wolfgang Thormann; Stefan Zimmerli
Journal:  Ophthalmic Res       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.892

6.  Toxicity and pharmacokinetics of subconjunctival amphotericin B. An experimental study.

Authors:  D M O'Day; R Smith; J B Stevens; T E Williams; R D Robinson; W S Head
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 7.  Clinical use of liposomal and lipid-complexed amphotericin B.

Authors:  S de Marie; R Janknegt; I A Bakker-Woudenberg
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 8.  Mycotic keratitis--an underestimated mycosis.

Authors:  P A Thomas
Journal:  J Med Vet Mycol       Date:  1994

Review 9.  Mycotic keratitis: an overview of diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  P K Shukla; M Kumar; G B S Keshava
Journal:  Mycoses       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.377

Review 10.  Lipid-based formulations of amphotericin B.

Authors:  Prabhakar R Veerareddy; Venkateswarlu Vobalaboina
Journal:  Drugs Today (Barc)       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.245

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Challenges in the Polyene- and Azole-Based Pharmacotherapy of Ocular Fungal Infections.

Authors:  Prit Lakhani; Akash Patil; Soumyajit Majumdar
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.671

2.  Genetic validation of Aspergillus fumigatus phosphoglucomutase as a viable therapeutic target in invasive aspergillosis.

Authors:  Kaizhou Yan; Mathew Stanley; Bartosz Kowalski; Olawale G Raimi; Andrew T Ferenbach; Pingzhen Wei; Wenxia Fang; Daan M F van Aalten
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 5.486

3.  Evaluation of Liposomal and Conventional Amphotericin B in Experimental Fungal Keratitis Rabbit Model.

Authors:  Anup Kumar Ghosh; Shivaprakash Mandya Rudramurthy; Amit Gupta; Hansraj Choudhary; Shreya Singh; Anchal Thakur; Manu Jatana
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Conjunctiva Necrosis Following Subconjunctival Amphotericin B Injection in Fungal Keratitis.

Authors:  Tham Han Shu; Adil Hussein; Mohd Razali Kursiah
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-09-05

5.  Genetic and structural validation of Aspergillus fumigatus UDP-N-acetylglucosamine pyrophosphorylase as an antifungal target.

Authors:  Wenxia Fang; Ting Du; Olawale G Raimi; Ramon Hurtado-Guerrero; Michael D Urbaniak; Adel F M Ibrahim; Michael A J Ferguson; Cheng Jin; Daan M F van Aalten
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.501

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.