M A Johnson1, A Davey, S Park, D B Hausman, L W Poon. 1. The University of Georgia, Department of Foods and Nutrition, 280 Dawson Hall, Athens, GA 30602, USA. mjohnson@fcs.uga.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Poor vitamin D status has been associated with osteoporosis, falls, cardiovascular diseases, cancer, autoimmune diseases, pain, nursing home placement, and other age-related conditions, but little is known about the prevalence and predictors of vitamin D status in those aged 80 and older. Thus, this study tested the hypothesis that vitamin D status would be 1) poorer in a population-based multi-ethnic sample of centenarians as compared with octogenarians and 2) predicted by specific dietary, demographic or environmental factors. DESIGN: Cross-sectional population-based analyses. SETTING: Northern Georgia in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Men and women aged 80 to 89 (octogenarians, n=80) and 98 and older (centenarians, n=237). MEASUREMENTS: Regression analyses were used to examine the associations of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] with age, gender, race, living arrangements, dairy food intake, supplement intake, and season. RESULTS: The prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency [25(OH)D<50 nmol/L] was higher in centenarians than in octogenarians (p<0.02). In logistic regression analyses, the risk of being vitamin D insufficient was significantly increased by being a centenarian vs. octogenarian (p<0.005) and by being African American vs. white (p<0.001) and decreased by taking a supplement with vitamin D (p<0.001) or by having vitamin D status measured in the summer or fall (each p<0.05), compared with spring. CONCLUSIONS: Centenarians and octogenarians are at high risk for vitamin D insufficiency for many of the same reasons identified in younger populations. Given the numerous potential adverse consequences of poor vitamin D status, efforts are needed to ensure vitamin D adequacy in these older adults.
OBJECTIVE: Poor vitamin D status has been associated with osteoporosis, falls, cardiovascular diseases, cancer, autoimmune diseases, pain, nursing home placement, and other age-related conditions, but little is known about the prevalence and predictors of vitamin D status in those aged 80 and older. Thus, this study tested the hypothesis that vitamin D status would be 1) poorer in a population-based multi-ethnic sample of centenarians as compared with octogenarians and 2) predicted by specific dietary, demographic or environmental factors. DESIGN: Cross-sectional population-based analyses. SETTING: Northern Georgia in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Men and women aged 80 to 89 (octogenarians, n=80) and 98 and older (centenarians, n=237). MEASUREMENTS: Regression analyses were used to examine the associations of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] with age, gender, race, living arrangements, dairy food intake, supplement intake, and season. RESULTS: The prevalence of vitamin Dinsufficiency [25(OH)D<50 nmol/L] was higher in centenarians than in octogenarians (p<0.02). In logistic regression analyses, the risk of being vitamin D insufficient was significantly increased by being a centenarian vs. octogenarian (p<0.005) and by being African American vs. white (p<0.001) and decreased by taking a supplement with vitamin D (p<0.001) or by having vitamin D status measured in the summer or fall (each p<0.05), compared with spring. CONCLUSIONS: Centenarians and octogenarians are at high risk for vitamin Dinsufficiency for many of the same reasons identified in younger populations. Given the numerous potential adverse consequences of poor vitamin D status, efforts are needed to ensure vitamin D adequacy in these older adults.
Authors: M S Stein; L Flicker; S C Scherer; L M Paton; M L O'Brien; S C Walton; P Chick; M Di Carlantonio; J D Zajac; J D Wark Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: Shanna Nesby-O'Dell; Kelley S Scanlon; Mary E Cogswell; Cathleen Gillespie; Bruce W Hollis; Anne C Looker; Chris Allen; Cindy Doughertly; Elaine W Gunter; Barbara A Bowman Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Sarah K Holt; Erika M Kwon; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Daniel W Lin; Ziding Feng; Elaine A Ostrander; Ulrike Peters; Janet L Stanford Journal: Prostate Date: 2010-09-15 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: D B Hausman; M A Johnson; A Davey; J L Woodard; L W Poon; R H Allen; S P Stabler Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Sarah K Holt; Suzanne Kolb; Rong Fu; Ronald Horst; Ziding Feng; Janet L Stanford Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2013-08-20 Impact factor: 2.984