Literature DB >> 19043323

A comparison of inferface pressures of three compression bandage systems.

Richard Hanna1, Serge Bohbot, Nicki Connolly.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure and compare the interface pressures achieved with two compression bandage systems - a four-layer system (4LB) and a two-layer short-stretch system (SSB) - with a new two-layer system (2LB), which uses an etalonnage (performance indicator) to help achieve the correct therapeutic pressure for healing venous leg ulcers - recommended as 40 mmHg.
METHOD: 32 nurses with experience of using compression bandages applied each of the three systems to a healthy female volunteer in a sitting position. The interface pressures and time taken to apply the systems were measured. A questionnaire regarding the concept of the new system and its application in comparison to the existing two systems was then completed by the nurses.
RESULTS: The interface pressures achieved show that many nurses applied very high pressures with the 4LB (25% achieving pressures > 50 mmHg) whereas the majority of the nurses (75%) achieved a pressure of < 30 mmHg when using the SSB. A pressure of 30-50 mmHg was achieved with the new 2LB. The SSB took the least time to be applied (mean: 1 minute 50 seconds) with the 4LB the slowest (mean: 3 minutes 46 seconds). A mean time of 2 minutes 35 seconds was taken to apply the 2LB. Over 63% of the nurses felt the 2LB was very easy to apply.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the 2LB achieves the required therapeutic pressure necessary for the management of venous leg ulcers, is easy to apply and may provide a suitable alternative to other multi-layer bandage systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19043323     DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2008.17.Sup9.31661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nurs        ISSN: 0966-0461


  1 in total

1.  Low-grade elastic compression regimen for venous leg ulcers--an effective compromise for patients requiring daily dressing changes.

Authors:  Ganary Dabiri; Scott Hammerman; Polly Carson; Vincent Falanga
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.315

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.