Literature DB >> 19043314

Implantation of canine umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells mixed with beta-tricalcium phosphate enhances osteogenesis in bone defect model dogs.

Byung Jun Jang1, Ye Eun Byeon, Ji Hey Lim, Hak Hyun Ryu, Wan Hee Kim, Yoshihisa Koyama, Masanori Kikuchi, Kyung Sun Kang, Oh Kyeong Kweon.   

Abstract

This study was performed to evaluate the osteogenic effect of allogenic canine umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UCB-MSCs) mixed with beta-tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP) in orthotopic implantation. Seven hundred milligrams of beta-TCP mixed with 1 x 10(6) UCB-MSCs diluted with 0.5 ml of saline (group CM) and mixed with the same volume of saline as control (group C) were implanted into a 1.5 cm diaphyseal defect and wrapped with PLGC membrane in the radius of Beagle dogs. Radiographs of the antebrachium were made after surgery. The implants were harvested 12 weeks after implantation and specimens were stained with H&E, toluidine blue and Villanueva-Goldner stains for histological examination and histomorphometric analysis of new bone formation. Additionally, UCB-MSCs were applied to a dog with non-union fracture. Radiographically, continuity between implant and host bone was evident at only one of six interfaces in group C by 12 weeks, but in three of six interfaces in group CM. Radiolucency was found only near the bone end in group C at 12 weeks after implantation, but in the entire graft in group CM. Histologically, bone formation was observed around beta-TCP in longitudinal sections of implant in both groups. Histomorphometric analysis revealed significantly increased new bone formation in group CM at 12 weeks after implantation (p < 0.05). When applied to the non-union fracture, fracture healing was identified by 6 weeks after injection of UCB-MSCs. The present study indicates that a mixture of UCB-MSCs and beta-TCP is a promising osteogenic material for repairing bone defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19043314      PMCID: PMC2811780          DOI: 10.4142/jvs.2008.9.4.387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Sci        ISSN: 1229-845X            Impact factor:   1.672


Introduction

Repairing non-union fractures or bony defects is surgically challenging. Synthetic bone substitutes and osteogenic materials have been evaluated as aids [2,18,29,31]. Among the synthetic bone substitutes, hydroxyapatite and other calcium phosphate ceramics have shown the most promising results due to their osteoconductive properties, unlimited availability and absence of immune response [9,25,28]. A potential limitation of such materials is the slow biodegradation rate observed in pure hydroxyapatite. However, implants comprised of beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) are resorbable [6]. β-TCP has shown good biocompatibility and osseointegration, but appreciable amounts were still present after 12 months [17]. Recently, it has been reported that umbilical cord blood can serve as an alternative source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and human umbilical cord blood-derived MSCs (UCB-MSCs) contain multi-potent cells including those with osteogenic potential [22,27]. Furthermore, UCB-MSCs may be immune-privileged cells with surface characteristics that enable circumvention of immune rejection [5,7]. Recently, we isolated canine UCB-MSCs [21], which provides a ready source of the cells. The present study reports enhanced osteogenesis by the implantation of canine UCB-MSCs mixed with β-TCP in bone defect model dogs, and the successful repair of a non-union fracture case by allografting and injection of canine UCB-MSCs.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Six healthy Beagle dogs (15.4 ± 1.2 months, B.W 6~7 kg) were used for the orthotopic implantation. There were two experimental groups: canine UCB-MSCs grafting and control, with three dogs per group. The dogs were housed in indoor cages. Food and water were supplied ad libitum. All animal experiments conformed to the Guidelines for Animal Experiments of Seoul National University.

Preparation of canine UCB-MSCs

Fetal umbilical cord blood was collected during Caesarean section of pregnant female dogs. Canine UCB-MSCs were produced by culturing to facilitate proliferation of mononucleated cells from cord blood as verified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis, and by the in vitro differentiation of bone [21]. Cells (1 × 106) were prepared for implantation. Canine UCB-MSCs were suspended with 500 µl of normal saline prior to mixing with 700 mg of β-TCP (group CM). The same volume of normal saline mixed with β-TCP was prepared as the control (group C).

Bioceramic implants

β-TCP powder and the β-TCP/poly L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone composite (TCP/PLGC) membrane were gifts of the Biomaterials Center, National Institute for Materials Science, Japan. β-TCP particle diameter averaged about 125 µm and the molecular weight of PLGC was 250,000. Each TCP/PLGC membrane was prepared by mixing β-TCP particles and PLGC in a weight ratio of 7:3 for 10 min at 180℃. The composite was formed into 200 µm thick membranes with a hot-press [15].

Orthotopic implantation and harvest

After dogs were premedicated with 0.2 mg butorphanol (Myungmoon Pharm, Korea) at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg body weight and acepromazine maleate (Samwoo, Korea) at a dose of 0.05 mg/kg body weight, 1% propofol (Claris Lifesciences, India) at a dose of 6 mg/kg body weight was intravenously injected to induce anesthesia. Isoflurane (Ilsung Pharmaceutical, Korea) was used to maintain anesthesia. Under sterile conditions, a craniomedial approach was performed to expose the diaphysis of right radius. The periosteum was elevated only enough to allow the plate to lie directly on the bone. An eight-hole, 2.7 dynamic compression plate (Synthes, Switzerland) was contoured and applied to the cranial aspect of the radius. The plate was then removed and a 15 mm long osteoperiosteal segmental cortical defect was made at the mid-portion of the diaphysis with an oscillation bone saw [3]. The plate was then reapplied, mixed materials were implanted in the defect, and the implanted site was wrapped with TCP/PLGC to prevent leakage of implants. After closing the soft tissue, a Robert John's bandage was applied for 2 weeks. The implants were harvested 12 weeks after implantation.

Radiographic examination

Lateral and craniocaudal radiographs of the right antebrachium were made before and immediately after surgery as well as 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after implantation. Each radiographic evaluation focused on the continuity between host bone and implant, and the change of implant radiopacity.

Histological examination

Segments of bone including defect sites were removed and processed for histological analysis without decalcification. Specimens were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and processed for methyl methacrylate embedding using an Osteo-Bed Bone embedding kit (Polysciences, USA). Longitudinal sections were cut in the sagittal planes using a microtome. The central longitudinal sections from each radius were ground to a thickness of 100 µm and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), toluidine blue, and Villanueva-Goldner stains to evaluate new bone formation. Stained sections from each group were observed under a light microscope and were scanned using an attached digital camera and a NIS-Elements system (Nikon, Japan). The areas of new bone formation and the residual β-TCP were determined and converted to a percentage of total area of bone defect.

Statistics

Student's t-test was performed to compare the new bone formation between the C and CM groups at a 95% confidence level.

Clinical application

A 6-month-old Toy poodle that had been operated on twice previously presented to the Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, Seoul National University, with radial non-union fracture (Fig. 1A). A cortical allograft was implanted (Fig. 1B). Graft lysis and instability of fractured site were observed 9 weeks after implantation (Fig. 1C). Under fluoroscopy-aided guidance, 1 × 107 canine UCB- MSCs diluted with 0.5 ml saline were injected into the bone defect formed by graft lysis. Another injection was done 1 month later.
Fig. 1

Radiographs of antebrachium in clinical application. (A) Preoperative: non-union fracture of the right distal radius. (B) Postoperative: plate & screw fixation with cortical allograft and cancellous bone autograft. (C) 9 weeks postoperative: Bone lysis, irregular margin and disuse atrophy of the bone were observed.

Results

Animal model

All dogs were able to bear weight partially by 2 weeks, after which they became active in their enclosures. All wounds healed without infection and there were no failures of fixation.

Radiographic findings

Postoperatively, the defect could be visualized easily because of the radiopacity of the material. With time, the radiolucent site gradually expanded from interface between the host bone and the implant to the central part of the defect in both groups, but the tendency was clearer in group CM (Fig. 2). Radiolucency was found only near the bone end in group C by 12 weeks but was evident throughout the entire graft in group CM.
Fig. 2

Lateral radiographs of antebrachium after implantation and 2, 4, 8, 12 weeks. Radiolucency is found only near bone end in group C (implantation of β-TCP with saline), but entire graft in group CM (implantation of β-TCP with umbilical cord blood derived stem cells) at 12 weeks.

Union between implant and host bone was seen at only one of six interfaces in group C by 12 weeks (Fig. 2: proximal interface of C1). In group CM, continuity was established at three of six interfaces by 12 weeks (Fig. 2: proximal interface of CM1, 2 and 3).

Histological findings

Bone formation was observed around β-TCP in longitudinal sections of implants in both groups 12 weeks after implantation (Fig. 3). β-TCP remained in both sides and the distal one third of the implant, especially under the fixation plate and in group C. Osteocytes were evident around the β-TCP (Fig. 4A). New bone was in direct contact with the β-TCP granules (Figs. 4B and C). Histomorphometric analysis revealed percentages of new bone formation in groups C and CM were 4.08 ± 2.08 and 10.92 ± 2.74, respectively (p < 0.05). Residual percentages of β-TCP were 40.63 ± 17.86 and 24.21 ± 8.75, in groups C and CM, respectively (Table 1).
Fig. 3

Microphotographs of longitudinal sections of implants in the groups C (A) and CM (B, C) at 12 weeks after implantation of β-TCP. The proximal portion is at the top of the photomicrograph. The cranial aspect of bone (where the fixation plate had been) is at the left of photomicrograph. Bone appears blue or red, and ceramic appears black. (A, B) toluidine blue stain. (C) Villanueva-Goldner stain. ×10. Bone formation is observed around β-TCP throughout the implant. β-TCP remained in both side of the implant, especially under fixation plate and in the group C.

Fig. 4

Microphotographs of implants at 12 weeks after implantation in the group CM. New bone was in direct contact with the β-TCP granules. (A) H&E stain: Osteocyte is observed around the β-TCP. (B) Villanueva-Goldner stain (red-immature bone, green-mature bone). (C) Toluidine blue stain.

Table 1

Histomorphometric analysis

NBA: new bone formation area. RTA: residual β-TCP area. TA: total area. *p < 0.05 compared with C group. aAll values are means ± SD.

Radiographically, increased opacity between radius and allograft bone, and a decreased radiolucent gap was checked four weeks after injection of canine UCB-MSCs. With time, the radiolucent site gradually decreased and the radiolucent fracture line disappeared (Fig. 5). Instability at fracture site was decreased by 8 weeks after injection. The dog could bear weight partially by 8 weeks.
Fig. 5

Lateral radiographs of antebrachium at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after first injection of canine umbilical cord blood derived stem cells.

Discussion

Radiography is useful to assess the union at host bone-implant interfaces as an important factor of bone healing [1,3]. Presently, a distinct radiolucent zone at the interface between implants and the host bone was visible on the immediate postoperative radiographs. The absence of this radiolucent zone was considered to be an indication of union between the implant and the host bone. In the present study, union at the host bone-implant interface occurred more often and more rapidly in group CM than group C. An ideal bone graft substitute should resorb fully and at a predictable rate, while also providing a three-dimensional matrix to support bone ingrowth and ongrowth during resorption [33]. The appearance of implanted β-TCP on X-rays was the density of bone in early phase. Thereafter, as further resorption of the β-TCP and bone remodeling occurred, density decreased more [32]. In this study, radiolucency was found only near the bone end in group C, but throughout the entire graft in group CM at 12 weeks. Previous studies used bloc ceramics with pores precultured with cells in osteogenic medium or vacuumed for uniform loading and retention of cells [13,34]. In the present study, β-TCP granules were mixed with cells immediately before implantation; this method of cell-matrix combination can be easily performed in a clinical setting. In the previous report [3], new bone was distributed uniformly throughout the cell-matrix implant. However, in the present study, β-TCP remained in both sides and the distal one third of the implant, especially under the fixation plate and in group C, as evident histologically 12 weeks after implantation. β-TCP that remained under the fixation plate could be due to impaired blood supply to outer cortical bone beneath plates [8]. In the present study, implants were wrapped with TCP/PLGC membrane to prevent leakage of the β-TCP granule-cell mixture and invasion of fibrous connective tissues into the implant instead of vascular and host bone ingrowth. In assessing the present observations, it was suggested that vascular or bone ingrowth may have depended largely on proximal host bone. Bone formation with bone graft substitute relies on a complex sequence of events with a major dependence on vascular ingrowth, differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells, bone remodeling and graft resorption that occur together with host bone ingrowth into and onto the porous coralline microstructure or voids left behind during resorption [33]. Callus formation around an implant in the segmental defect treated with a ceramic cylinder that had been loaded with mesenchymal stem cells was reported [3]; similar observations were not made in the present study. It is conceivable that TCP/PLGC membrane might interrupt vascular ingrowth around implant and callus formation. Histomorphological examinations conducted 12 weeks after the implantation of mixture of β-TCP and cells revealed significantly greater area of new bone formation than control (p < 0.05) and a smaller amount of residual TCP. Previous studies showed that bone marrow-derived MSCs are capable of forming bone in vitro [12,13], and when implanted in an appropriate matrix ectopically or orthotopically [3,14]. Implants with autologous bone marrow MSCs contain more new bones within and around implants in canine segmental bone defect [3]. While undifferentiated adipose derived stromal cells with β-TCP does not affect bone regeneration [20], canine UCB-MSCs presently produced a contrary result. In a study involving athymic rats, human UCB-MSCs displayed osteogenic differentiation in vitro, survived after xenotransplantation and differentiated into osteoblasts that filled the bony defects [10]. A recent study reported that human UCB-MSCs have a significantly stronger osteogenic potential but less capacity in adipogenic differentiation than bone marrow MSCs in vitro [4]. Presently, canine UCB-MSCs might have enhanced new bone formation by differentiating to osteoblast progenitors. Alternatively, a paracrine effect of canine UCB-MSCs may have enhanced new bone formation. Analyses of bone marrow MSCs with real-time polymerase chain reaction and of bone marrow MSC-conditioned medium by antibody-based protein array and enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay indicated that bone marrow MSCs secrete distinctively different cytokines and chemokines such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), insulin-like growth factor-1, epidermal growth factor, keratinocyte growth factor, angiopoietin-1, stromal derived factor-1, macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha, -1beta and erythropoietin, compared to dermal fibroblasts [5]. Several cytokines, chemokines and growth factors are produced during in vitro osteogenic differentiation from human UCB-MSCs, with VEGF being perhaps the most critical driver of vascular formation during osteogenesis [26]. VEGF also stimulates osteoblast proliferation, migration and differentiation [23]. These cytokine alterations accelerate osteogenesis [16,19,30,35]. Further studies will be needed to elucidate the mechanism of bone formation by canine UCB-MSCs. In a cortical allograft, the host-graft interface heals within 3 months [11]. Vascular invasion begins at the interface and progresses toward the center of the graft. Remodeling of the graft takes months to years, depending on the length, and might never be complete [24]. In the present clinical case, bone lysis and instability of the fractured site was evident by 9 weeks after cortical allograft. After injection of canine UCB-MSCs, bone regeneration gradually appeared in defect sites. Although there was some doubt whether bone formation was attributable to the introduced canine UCB-MSCs or to an endochondral sequence, the injected canine UCB-MSCs injected might play a role in osteoconduction in the graft site. The results of the present study demonstrate that canine UCB-MSCs accelerate new bone formation upon the implantation of β-TCP into segmental defects in dogs. Implantation of allogenic UCB-MSCs with β-TCP holds promise in the clinical repair of segmental bone defects and non-union fractures.
  32 in total

1.  Effect of IL-12 on TNF-alpha-mediated osteoclast formation in bone marrow cells: apoptosis mediated by Fas/Fas ligand interaction.

Authors:  Hideki Kitaura; Noriko Nagata; Yuji Fujimura; Hitoshi Hotokezaka; Noriaki Yoshida; Koji Nakayama
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  Evaluation of chemokine and cytokine profiles in osteoblast progenitors from umbilical cord blood stem cells by BIO-PLEX technology.

Authors:  Letizia Penolazzi; Elisabetta Lambertini; Elisa Tavanti; Elena Torreggiani; Fortunato Vesce; Roberto Gambari; Roberta Piva
Journal:  Cell Biol Int       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Human bone marrow stromal cells suppress T-lymphocyte proliferation induced by cellular or nonspecific mitogenic stimuli.

Authors:  Massimo Di Nicola; Carmelo Carlo-Stella; Michele Magni; Marco Milanesi; Paolo D Longoni; Paola Matteucci; Salvatore Grisanti; Alessandro M Gianni
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells regenerate bone in a critical-sized canine segmental defect.

Authors:  Treena Livingston Arinzeh; Susan J Peter; Michael P Archambault; Christian van den Bos; Steve Gordon; Karl Kraus; Alan Smith; Sudha Kadiyala
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Biocompatibility and osseointegration of beta-TCP: histomorphological and biomechanical studies in a weight-bearing sheep model.

Authors:  Holger E Koepp; Sandra Schorlemmer; Stefan Kessler; Rolf E Brenner; Lutz Claes; Klaus-Peter Günther; Anita A Ignatius
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 3.368

6.  Development of guided bone regeneration membrane composed of beta-tricalcium phosphate and poly (L-lactide-co-glycolide-co-epsilon-caprolactone) composites.

Authors:  Masanori Kikuchi; Yoshihisa Koyama; Takeki Yamada; Yukari Imamura; Takao Okada; Noriaki Shirahama; Kazumi Akita; Kazuo Takakuda; Junzo Tanaka
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  The biodegradation mechanism of calcium phosphate biomaterials in bone.

Authors:  Jianxi Lu; Michel Descamps; Jacques Dejou; Gilles Koubi; Pierre Hardouin; Jacques Lemaitre; Jean-Pierre Proust
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2002

Review 8.  IL-6, RANKL, TNF-alpha/IL-1: interrelations in bone resorption pathophysiology.

Authors:  Steeve Kwan Tat; Marc Padrines; Sandrine Théoleyre; Dominique Heymann; Yannick Fortun
Journal:  Cytokine Growth Factor Rev       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.638

9.  A resorbable porous ceramic composite bone graft substitute in a rabbit metaphyseal defect model.

Authors:  W R Walsh; P J Chapman-Sheath; S Cain; J Debes; W J M Bruce; M J Svehla; R M Gillies
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Paracrine factors of mesenchymal stem cells recruit macrophages and endothelial lineage cells and enhance wound healing.

Authors:  Liwen Chen; Edward E Tredget; Philip Y G Wu; Yaojiong Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  14 in total

1.  Mesenchymal stromal cells from human perinatal tissues: From biology to cell therapy.

Authors:  Karen Bieback; Irena Brinkmann
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 2.  Honing Cell and Tissue Culture Conditions for Bone and Cartilage Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Johnny Lam; Esther J Lee; Elisa C Clark; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 6.915

3.  Osteoinductivity of gelatin/β-tricalcium phosphate sponges loaded with different concentrations of mesenchymal stem cells and bone morphogenetic protein-2 in an equine bone defect model.

Authors:  Jong-Pil Seo; Nao Tsuzuki; Shingo Haneda; Kazutaka Yamada; Hidefumi Furuoka; Yasuhiko Tabata; Naoki Sasaki
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 2.459

4.  Evaluation of trabecular bone formation in a canine model surrounding a dental implant fixture immobilized with an antimicrobial peptide derived from histatin.

Authors:  Seicho Makihira; Hiroki Nikawa; Takahiro Shuto; Masahiro Nishimura; Yuichi Mine; Koichiro Tsuji; Keishi Okamoto; Yuhiro Sakai; Masanori Sakai; Naoya Imari; Satoshi Iwata; Mika Takeda; Fumio Suehiro
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 5.  Stem cell therapy for bone repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies with large animal models.

Authors:  Yun Liao; Xiao-Long Zhang; Ling Li; Fu-Ming Shen; Ming-Kang Zhong
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Mesenchymal stem cells as a potent cell source for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Elham Zomorodian; Mohamadreza Baghaban Eslaminejad
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 5.443

7.  The canine epiphyseal-derived mesenchymal stem cells are comparable to bone marrow derived-mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Ya-Pei Chang; Hsuan-Ping Hong; Yen-Hua Lee; I-Hsuan Liu
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 1.267

8.  Effect of serum-derived albumin scaffold and canine adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells on osteogenesis in canine segmental bone defect model.

Authors:  Daeyoung Yoon; Byung-Jae Kang; Yongsun Kim; Seung Hoon Lee; Daeun Rhew; Wan Hee Kim; Oh-Kyeong Kweon
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.672

9.  Evaluation of the Effect of a Single Intra-articular Injection of Allogeneic Neonatal Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Compared to Oral Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Treatment on the Postoperative Musculoskeletal Status and Gait of Dogs over a 6-Month Period after Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Mathieu Taroni; Quentin Cabon; Marine Fèbre; Thibaut Cachon; Nathalie Saulnier; Claude Carozzo; Stéphane Maddens; Fabrice Labadie; Clément Robert; Eric Viguier
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-06-08

10.  Repair of human periodontal bone defects by autologous grafting stem cells derived from inflammatory dental pulp tissues.

Authors:  Ye Li; Shanmei Zhao; Xi Nan; Hong Wei; Jianfeng Shi; Ang Li; Jianzhong Gou
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 6.832

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.