Literature DB >> 19043127

European validation of the Vancouver classification of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures.

F Rayan1, M Dodd, F S Haddad.   

Abstract

The Vancouver classification has been shown by its developers to be a valid and reliable method for categorising the configuration of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures and for planning their management. We have re-validated this classification system independently using the radiographs of 30 patients with periprosthetic fractures. These were reviewed by six experienced consultant orthopaedic surgeons, six trainee surgeons and six medical students in order to assess intra- and interobserver reliability and reproducibility. Each observer read the radiographs on two separate occasions. The results were subjected to weighted kappa statistical analysis. The respective kappa values for interobserver agreement were 0.72 and 0.74 for consultants, 0.68 and 0.70 for trainees on the first and second readings of the radiographs and 0.61 for medical students. The intra-observer agreement for the consultants was 0.64 and 0.67, for the trainees 0.61 and 0.64, and for the medical students 0.59 and 0.60 for the first and second readings, respectively. The validity of the classification was studied by comparing the pre-operative radiological findings within B subgroups with the operative findings. This revealed agreement for 77% of these type-B fractures, with a kappa value of 0.67. Our data confirm the reliability and reproducibility of this classification system in a European setting and for inexperienced staff. This is a reliable system which can be used by non-experts, between centres and across continents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19043127     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B12.20681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  20 in total

Review 1.  In brief: classifications in brief: Vancouver classification of postoperative periprosthetic femur fractures.

Authors:  Greg E Gaski; Sean P Scully
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A new classification for proximal femur bone defects in conservative hip arthroplasty revisions.

Authors:  Filippo Casella; Fabio Favetti; Gabriele Panegrossi; Matteo Papalia; Francesco Falez
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  A new classification for proximal femur bone defects in conservative hip arthroplasty revisions.

Authors:  Filippo Casella; Fabio Favetti; Gabriele Panegrossi; Matteo Papalia; Francesco Falez
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  New fracture pattern focusing on implant fracture for periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Jie-Feng Huang; Jian-Jian Shen; Jun-Jie Chen; Yang Zheng; Wen-Xi Du; Fu-Cun Liu; Pei-Jian Tong
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Could Patient Undergwent Surgical Treatment for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture after Hip Arthroplasty Return to Their Status before Trauma?

Authors:  Long Zheng; Woo-Yong Lee; Deuk-Soo Hwang; Chan Kang; Chang-Kyun Noh
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-06-30

6.  New classification focusing on implant designs useful for setting therapeutic strategy for periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Tomonori Baba; Yasuhiro Homma; Rei Momomura; Hideo Kobayashi; Mikio Matsumoto; Kentaro Futamura; Atsuhiko Mogami; Akio Kanda; Itaru Morohashi; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Periprosthetic femoral fractures--incidence, classification problems and the proposal of a modified classification scheme.

Authors:  Stephan Frenzel; Vilmos Vécsei; Lukas Negrin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures treated with revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tomas Amenabar; Wael A Rahman; Vineet V Avhad; Ramiro Vera; Allan E Gross; Paul R Kuzyk
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Fractures in bone tumour prosthesis.

Authors:  Andrea Piccioli; Barbara Rossi; Federico Maria Sacchetti; Maria Silvia Spinelli; Alberto Di Martino
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  A review of periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel Marsland; Simon C Mears
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2012-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.