Literature DB >> 19043050

Forelimb proportions and kinematics: how are small primates different from other small mammals?

Manuela Schmidt1.   

Abstract

The crouched limb posture of small mammals enables them to react to unexpected irregularities in the support. Small arboreal primates would benefit from these kinematics in their arboreal habitat but it has been demonstrated that primates display certain differences in forelimb kinematics to other mammals. The objective of this paper is to find out whether these changes in forelimb kinematics are related to changes in body size and limb proportions. As primates descended from small ancestors, a comparison between living small primates and other small mammals makes it possible to determine the polarity of character transformations for kinematic and morphometric features proposed to be unique to primates. Walking kinematics of mouse lemurs, brown lemurs, cotton-top tamarins and squirrel monkeys was investigated using cineradiography. Morphometry was conducted on a sample of 110 mammals comprising of primates, marsupials, rodents and carnivores. It has been shown that forelimb kinematics change with increasing body size in such a way that limb protraction increases but retraction decreases. Total forelimb excursion, therefore, is almost independent of body size. Kinematic changes are linked to changes in forelimb proportions towards greater asymmetry between scapula and radius. Due to the spatial restriction inherent in the diagonal footfall sequence of primates, forelimb excursion is influenced by the excursion of the elongated hind limb. Hindlimb geometry, however, is highly conserved, as has been previously shown. The initial changes in forelimb kinematics might, therefore, be explained as solutions to a constraint rather than as adaptations to the particular demands of arboreal locomotion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19043050     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.019802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

1.  The statistics of the vestibular input experienced during natural self-motion differ between rodents and primates.

Authors:  Jérome Carriot; Mohsen Jamali; Maurice J Chacron; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Fibre type composition in the lumbar perivertebral muscles of primates: implications for the evolution of orthogrady in hominoids.

Authors:  J Neufuss; B Hesse; S K S Thorpe; E E Vereecke; K D'Aout; M S Fischer; N Schilling
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Treadmill locomotion of the mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus); kinematic parameters during symmetrical and asymmetrical gaits.

Authors:  Marc Herbin; Eva Hommet; Vicky Hanotin-Dossot; Martine Perret; Rémi Hackert
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the pectoral girdle during upside-down locomotion of two-toed sloths (Choloepus didactylus, Linné 1758).

Authors:  John A Nyakatura; Martin S Fischer
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 3.172

5.  Scaling of convex hull volume to body mass in modern primates, non-primate mammals and birds.

Authors:  Charlotte A Brassey; William I Sellers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Gait changes in a line of mice artificially selected for longer limbs.

Authors:  Leah M Sparrow; Emily Pellatt; Sabrina S Yu; David A Raichlen; Herman Pontzer; Campbell Rolian
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.