Literature DB >> 19042917

Correlation of minimal residual disease cell frequency with molecular genotype in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Corine J Hess1, Nicole Feller, Fedor Denkers, Angèle Kelder, Pauline A Merle, Michael C Heinrich, Amy Harlow, Johannes Berkhof, Gert J Ossenkoppele, Quinten Waisfisz, Gerrit J Schuurhuis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: About 70-80 percent of patients with acute myeloid leukemia enter complete remission, but at least half of these patients who achieve remission go on to relapse. Improved treatment is likely to come from increasing the time to relapse, especially for younger patients. With the vastly increasing number of targeted therapies there is a strong need for short-term end-points to efficiently test such therapies for further pursuance. Minimal residual disease assessment may offer such an end-point since it is a strong independent prognostic factor. As proof of principle we examined this concept for FLT3-ITD status at diagnosis. DESIGN AND METHODS: We determined FLT3-ITD status in bone marrow samples from 196 patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. The frequencies of residual leukemic cells of these 196 patients were assessed in 267 follow-up bone marrow samples using immunophenotypic assessment of minimal residual disease.
RESULTS: The median frequency of residual leukemic cells after the first cycle of chemotherapy was 8.5-fold higher in patients with FLT3-ITD than in those with wild type FLT3. Such a difference translates into differences in survival, even if other potentially outcome-modulating mutations, such as NPM1, KIT, NRAS, KRAS, FLT3-exon 20 and PTPN11 are included in the analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that it could be possible to study the efficacy of FLT3 inhibitors using the level of minimal residual disease as a short-term end-point.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19042917      PMCID: PMC2625416          DOI: 10.3324/haematol.13110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haematologica        ISSN: 0390-6078            Impact factor:   9.941


  20 in total

1.  Level of minimal residual disease after consolidation therapy predicts outcome in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  A Venditti; F Buccisano; G Del Poeta; L Maurillo; A Tamburini; C Cox; A Battaglia; G Catalano; B Del Moro; L Cudillo; M Postorino; M Masi; S Amadori
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  High percentage of CD34-positive cells in autologous AML peripheral blood stem cell products reflects inadequate in vivo purging and low chemotherapeutic toxicity in a subgroup of patients with poor clinical outcome.

Authors:  N Feller; G J Schuurhuis; M A van der Pol; G Westra; G W D Weijers; A van Stijn; P C Huijgens; G J Ossenkoppele
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.528

3.  Minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia is predicted by P-glycoprotein activity but not by multidrug resistance protein activity at diagnosis.

Authors:  M A van der Pol; N Feller; G J Ossenkoppele; G W D Weijers; A H Westra; A van Stijn; H J Broxterman; G J Schuurhuis
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Immunophenotyping investigation of minimal residual disease is a useful approach for predicting relapse in acute myeloid leukemia patients.

Authors:  J F San Miguel; A Martínez; A Macedo; M B Vidriales; C López-Berges; M González; D Caballero; M A García-Marcos; F Ramos; J Fernández-Calvo; M J Calmuntia; J Diaz-Mediavilla; A Orfao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Stability and prognostic influence of FLT3 mutations in paired initial and relapsed AML samples.

Authors:  J Cloos; B F Goemans; C J Hess; J W van Oostveen; Q Waisfisz; S Corthals; D de Lange; N Boeckx; K Hählen; D Reinhardt; U Creutzig; G J Schuurhuis; Ch M Zwaan; G J L Kaspers
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  Analysis of FLT3-activating mutations in 979 patients with acute myelogenous leukemia: association with FAB subtypes and identification of subgroups with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Christian Thiede; Christine Steudel; Brigitte Mohr; Markus Schaich; Ulrike Schäkel; Uwe Platzbecker; Martin Wermke; Martin Bornhäuser; Markus Ritter; Andreas Neubauer; Gerhard Ehninger; Thomas Illmer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Functional characterization of minimal residual disease for P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance protein activity in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  M A van der Pol; J M Pater; N Feller; A H Westra; A van Stijn; G J Ossenkoppele; H J Broxterman; G J Schuurhuis
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 11.528

8.  SU5416, a small molecule tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor, has biologic activity in patients with refractory acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Francis J Giles; Alison T Stopeck; Lewis R Silverman; Jeffrey E Lancet; Maureen A Cooper; Alison L Hannah; Julie M Cherrington; Anne-Marie O'Farrell; Helene A Yuen; Sharianne G Louie; Weiru Hong; Jorge E Cortes; Srdan Verstovsek; Maher Albitar; Susan M O'Brien; Hagop M Kantarjian; Judith E Karp
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  MRD parameters using immunophenotypic detection methods are highly reliable in predicting survival in acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  N Feller; M A van der Pol; A van Stijn; G W D Weijers; A H Westra; B W Evertse; G J Ossenkoppele; G J Schuurhuis
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 11.528

10.  Evolution of FLT3-ITD and D835 activating point mutations in relapsing acute myeloid leukemia and response to salvage therapy.

Authors:  Jens Tiesmeier; Carsten Müller-Tidow; Annette Westermann; Andreas Czwalinna; Mandy Hoffmann; Jürgen Krauter; Gerhard Heil; Arnold Ganser; Hubert Serve; Walter Verbeek
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.156

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  MRD in AML: does it already guide therapy decision-making?

Authors:  Gert Ossenkoppele; Gerrit Jan Schuurhuis
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2016-12-02

Review 2.  How and why minimal residual disease studies are necessary in leukemia: a review from WP10 and WP12 of the European LeukaemiaNet.

Authors:  Marie C Béné; Jaspal S Kaeda
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  A next-generation sequencing-based assay for minimal residual disease assessment in AML patients with FLT3-ITD mutations.

Authors:  Mark J Levis; Alexander E Perl; Jessica K Altman; Christopher D Gocke; Erkut Bahceci; Jason Hill; Chaofeng Liu; Zhiyi Xie; Andrew R Carson; Valerie McClain; Timothy T Stenzel; Jeffrey E Miller
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-04-24

Review 4.  FLT3 inhibition and mechanisms of drug resistance in mutant FLT3-positive AML.

Authors:  Ellen Weisberg; Rosemary Barrett; Qingsong Liu; Richard Stone; Nathanael Gray; James D Griffin
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 18.500

5.  The impact of FLT3 mutation clearance and treatment response after gilteritinib therapy on overall survival in patients with FLT3 mutation-positive relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jessica K Altman; Alexander E Perl; Jason E Hill; Matt Rosales; Erkut Bahceci; Mark J Levis
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 4.452

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.