Literature DB >> 19041996

Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver: experience of 92 cases.

Hui-Xiong Xu1, Ming-De Lu, Xiao-Hua Xie, Xiao-Yan Xie, Zuo-Feng Xu, Li-Da Chen, Guang-Jian Liu, Jin-Yu Liang, Man-Xia Lin, Zhu Wang, Bei Huang.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound (3D-CEUS) is a combination of three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). To evaluate the feasibility of 3D-CEUS in liver imaging, investigate possible influencing factors to its image quality, and evaluate the influence of 3D-CEUS to clinical outcome, low acoustic power (mechanical index, 0.08-0.13) 3D-CEUS was carried out in 102 focal liver lesions in 92 patients by using the LOGIQ 9 ultrasound scanner and a volume transducer (frequency range, 2-5 MHz; focusing ability, 2-25 cm in depth; azimuth aperture 5.9 cm). The lesions were classified into two groups: group 1 (n=51) for characterization and group 2 (n=51) for local treatment response evaluation. The factors that influenced the image quality of 3D-CEUS were analyzed. The image quality and usefulness of 3D-CEUS between the two groups were compared by using the chi(2)-test. The results showed that the lesion diameter, location, and scanning route had no significant influence on the image quality in both groups, whereas interfering factors damaged the image quality in group 1. In group 1, during arterial phase, high image quality was more frequently found in hyperenhanced and hypo- or non-enhanced lesions compared with isoenhanced lesions. In group 2, interfering factor and local treatment response had no obvious influence on the image quality. The visualization rate of high image quality was 94.1% (48/51) in group 2 vs. 72.6% (37/51) in group 1 (P=0.012). The investigators found that 3D-CEUS improved confidence but made no change in diagnosis in 19 (37.3%) of 51 lesions in group 1, whereas 41 (80.4%) of 51 lesions in group 2 (P=0.000). 3D-CEUS tends to obtain better image quality and lead to higher diagnostic confidence in the lesions for local treatment response evaluation, and perhaps is more useful in this aspect in future clinical settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19041996     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2008.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  13 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: The evolving applications.

Authors:  Hui-Xiong Xu
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-31

2.  Application of real-time three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue for the evaluation of focal liver lesions: a prospective single-center study.

Authors:  Ying Lu; Baoxian Liu; Yanling Zheng; Jia Luo; Xiaoer Zhang; Guangliang Huang; Xiaohua Xie; Jieyi Ye; Wei Wang; Xusheng Liu; Xiaoyan Xie
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 3.  The current status of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in China.

Authors:  Hui-Xiong Xu; Ming-De Lu
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 1.314

4.  Era of diagnostic and interventional ultrasound.

Authors:  Hui-Xiong Xu
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-05-28

5.  Quantitative mapping of tumor vascularity using volumetric contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Kenneth Hoyt; Anna Sorace; Reshu Saini
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  High Resolution Ultrasound Superharmonic Perfusion Imaging: In Vivo Feasibility and Quantification of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Acoustic Angiography.

Authors:  Brooks D Lindsey; Sarah E Shelton; K Heath Martin; Kathryn A Ozgun; Juan D Rojas; F Stuart Foster; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  3D versus 2D contrast-enhanced sonography in the evaluation of therapeutic response of hepatocellular carcinoma after locoregional therapies: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Tommaso Vincenzo Bartolotta; Adele Taibbi; Domenica Matranga; Massimo Midiri; Roberto Lagalla
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Hepatocellular carcinoma after ablation: the imaging follow-up scheme.

Authors:  Lin-Na Liu; Hui-Xiong Xu; Yi-Feng Zhang; Jun-Mei Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Shu-Guang Zheng; Hui-Xiong Xu; Lin-Na Liu
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-01-28

10.  Quantitative Three-Dimensional Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: First-In-Human Pilot Study in Patients with Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Ahmed El Kaffas; Rosa Maria Silveira Sigrist; George Fisher; Sunitha Bachawal; Joy Liau; Huaijun Wang; Alexander Karanany; Isabelle Durot; Jarrett Rosenberg; Dimitre Hristov; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 11.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.