Literature DB >> 19041039

Vascular closure devices: a comparative overview.

Lye-Quen Hon1, Arul Ganeshan, Steven Mark Thomas, Dinuke Warakaulle, Jagalpathy Jagdish, Raman Uberoi.   

Abstract

The use of closure devices is widespread and becoming more common. Radiologists performing arterial access procedures should be aware of when and how to use them, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of various devices, and any complications that may occur. This review intends to provide an overview of these devices, focusing on how they work, their efficacy in achieving hemostasis, any risks associated with their use, and our view as to which should be used for particular indications. There are three main categories of vascular closure devices: collagen based, suture based, and staples and clips. Newer generation devices use the same technique of closure and there are some that utilize newer techniques. Vascular closure devices have been demonstrated to reduce time to hemostasis, facilitate ambulation, and potentially decrease length of stay. The choice of a device would depend on the availability of that particular device, operator preference, anticipation of repeat arterial access, and size of the arteriotomy hole.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19041039     DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2008.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol        ISSN: 0363-0188


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of PHBHHx and PHBV/PLA fibers used as medical sutures.

Authors:  Yu He; Zhiwei Hu; Mengda Ren; Changkun Ding; Peng Chen; Qun Gu; Qiong Wu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Clinical outcomes of femoral closure compared to radial compression devices following percutaneous coronary intervention: the FERARI study.

Authors:  Christian Fastner; Michael Behnes; Melike Ünsal; Ibrahim El-Battrawy; Uzair Ansari; Kambis Mashayekhi; Ursula Hoffmann; Siegfried Lang; Jürgen Kuschyk; Martin Borggrefe; Ibrahim Akin
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Development, preclinical evaluation and validation of a novel quick vascular closure device for transluminal, cardiac and radiological arterial catheterization.

Authors:  C Linti; M Doser; H Planck; S Oberhoffner; E Mueller; M Renardy; J Biesinger; B Neumann; K Stang; T O Greiner; C Schlensak; S Krajewski; H P Wendel
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Application of relay puncture technique in treating patients with complicated lower extremity arterial diseases.

Authors:  Chengzhi Li; Huimin You; Hong Zhang; Yulong Liu; Wanghai Li; Xiaobai Wang; Yan Zhang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Differences of bleedings after percutaneous coronary intervention using femoral closure and radial compression devices.

Authors:  Seung-Hyun Kim; Michael Behnes; Sebastian Baron; Tetyana Shchetynska-Marinova; Melike Tekinsoy; Kambis Mashayekhi; Ursula Hoffmann; Martin Borggrefe; Ibrahim Akin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Design and Rationale of the Femoral Closure versus Radial Compression Devices Related to Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (FERARI) Study.

Authors:  Michael Behnes; Melike Ünsal; Ursula Hoffmann; Christian Fastner; Ibrahim El-Battrawy; Siegfried Lang; Kambis Mashayekhi; Ralf Lehmann; Martin Borggrefe; Ibrahim Akin
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.