| Literature DB >> 19040733 |
Alvaro Mayor-Olea1, Gonzalo Callejón, Arturo R Palomares, Ana J Jiménez, María Jesús Gaitán, Alfonso Rodríguez, Maximiliano Ruiz, Armando Reyes-Engel.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of genotypes of the 677C>T polymorphism for the MTHFR gene varies among humans. In previous studies, we found changes in the genotypic frequencies of this polymorphism in populations of different ages, suggesting that this could be caused by an increase in the intake of folate and multivitamins by women during the periconceptional period. The aim was to analyze changes in the allelic frequencies of this polymorphism in a Spanish population, including samples from spontaneous abortions (SA).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 19040733 PMCID: PMC2610030 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-9-104
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genet ISSN: 1471-2350 Impact factor: 2.103
Distribution of C677T genotype frequencies in the 20th century.
| 0.393 | 81 | 0.394 | 126 | 0.37 | 151 | 0.299* | 111 | |
| 0.495 | 102 | 0.488 | 156 | 0.49 | 200 | 0.461 | 171 | |
| 0.112 | 23 | 0.119 | 38 | 0.14 | 57 | 0.24** | 89 | |
| 0.641 | 264 | 0.638 | 408 | 0.615 | 502 | 0.53** | 393 | |
| 0.359 | 148 | 0.363 | 232 | 0.385 | 314 | 0.47** | 349 | |
Note: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 (significance values in the last quarter of the century are relative to any other quarter of the century)
Figure 1Hypothetical evolution of the allelic frequencies of mthfr 677c>t polymorphism. Panel A represents the observed evolution of the allelic frequencies in the 20th century (DATA) and the hypothetical evolution predicted by the mathematical selection model (calculated fitness: s = 0.5) (PRED). Panel B represents the evolution of the allelic frequencies in the 20th century (DATA) and the hypothetical evolution based on an allelic balance dependent on folate abundance conditions.
Allelic and genotypic frequency comparison between fetal and control groups.
| % | n | % | n | % | n | |
| 0.073** | 8 | 0.008** | 1 | 0.019** | 2 | |
| 0.727** | 80 | 0.705** | 91 | 0.6*# | 63 | |
| 0.2 | 22 | 0.287 | 37 | 0.381## | 40 | |
| 0.436** | 96 | 0.36** | 93 | 0.319**# | 67 | |
| 0.564** | 124 | 0.64** | 165 | 0.681**# | 143 | |
| % | n | % | n | % | n | |
| 0.33 | 29 | 0.301 | 28 | 0.305 | 29 | |
| 0.477 | 42 | 0.452 | 42 | 0.421 | 40 | |
| 0.193 | 17 | 0.247 | 23 | 0.274 | 26 | |
| 0.568 | 100 | 0.527 | 98 | 0.516 | 98 | |
| 0.432 | 76 | 0.473 | 88 | 0.484 | 92 | |
Note: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 (significant values relative to controls). #p < 0.05; ##p < 0.01 (significant values relative to the 1982–1984 period)