OBJECTIVE: To integrate the mapping of ERG alterations with the collection of expression microarray (EMA) data, as previous EMA analyses have failed to consider the genetic heterogeneity and complex patterns of ERG alteration frequently found in cancerous prostates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We determined genome-wide expression levels with GeneChip Human Exon 1.0 ST arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using RNA prepared from 35 specimens of prostate cancer from 28 prostates. RESULTS: The expression profiles showed clustering, in unsupervised hierarchical analyses, into two distinct prostate cancer categories, with one group strongly associated with indicators of poor clinical outcome. The two categories are not tightly linked to ERG status. By analysis of the data we identified a subgroup of cancers lacking ERG rearrangements that showed an outlier pattern of SPINK1 mRNA expression. There was a major distinction between ERG rearranged and non-rearranged cancers that involves the levels of expression of genes linked to exposure to beta-oestradiol, and to retinoic acid. CONCLUSIONS: Expression profiling of prostate cancer samples containing single patterns of ERG alterations can provide novel insights into the mechanism of prostate cancer development, and support the view that factors other than ERG status are the major determinants of poor clinical outcome.
OBJECTIVE: To integrate the mapping of ERG alterations with the collection of expression microarray (EMA) data, as previous EMA analyses have failed to consider the genetic heterogeneity and complex patterns of ERG alteration frequently found in cancerous prostates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We determined genome-wide expression levels with GeneChip Human Exon 1.0 ST arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using RNA prepared from 35 specimens of prostate cancer from 28 prostates. RESULTS: The expression profiles showed clustering, in unsupervised hierarchical analyses, into two distinct prostate cancer categories, with one group strongly associated with indicators of poor clinical outcome. The two categories are not tightly linked to ERG status. By analysis of the data we identified a subgroup of cancers lacking ERG rearrangements that showed an outlier pattern of SPINK1 mRNA expression. There was a major distinction between ERG rearranged and non-rearranged cancers that involves the levels of expression of genes linked to exposure to beta-oestradiol, and to retinoic acid. CONCLUSIONS: Expression profiling of prostate cancer samples containing single patterns of ERG alterations can provide novel insights into the mechanism of prostate cancer development, and support the view that factors other than ERG status are the major determinants of poor clinical outcome.
Authors: Richard Flavin; Andreas Pettersson; Whitney K Hendrickson; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Stephen Finn; Lauren Kunz; Gregory L Judson; Rosina Lis; Dyane Bailey; Christopher Fiore; Elizabeth Nuttall; Neil E Martin; Edward Stack; Kathryn L Penney; Jennifer R Rider; Jennifer Sinnott; Christopher Sweeney; Howard D Sesso; Katja Fall; Edward Giovannucci; Philip Kantoff; Meir Stampfer; Massimo Loda; Lorelei A Mucci Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Paula Paulo; Franclim R Ribeiro; Joana Santos; Diana Mesquita; Mafalda Almeida; João D Barros-Silva; Harri Itkonen; Rui Henrique; Carmen Jerónimo; Anita Sveen; Ian G Mills; Rolf I Skotheim; Ragnhild A Lothe; Manuel R Teixeira Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: S Velaeti; E Dimitriadis; K Kontogianni-Katsarou; A Savvani; E Sdrolia; G Pantazi; S Stefanakis; T Trangas; N Pandis; K Petraki Journal: Tumour Biol Date: 2014-06-25
Authors: David S Rickman; Ying-Bei Chen; Samprit Banerjee; Yihang Pan; Jindan Yu; Terry Vuong; Sven Perner; Christopher J Lafargue; Kirsten D Mertz; Sunita R Setlur; Kanishka Sircar; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Tarek A Bismar; Mark A Rubin; Francesca Demichelis Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Riina-Minna Väänänen; Hans Lilja; Leni Kauko; Pauliina Helo; Henna Kekki; Angel M Cronin; Andrew J Vickers; Martti Nurmi; Kalle Alanen; Anders Bjartell; Kim Pettersson Journal: Urology Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Raquel Esgueva; Sven Perner; Christopher J LaFargue; Veit Scheble; Carsten Stephan; Michael Lein; Florian R Fritzsche; Manfred Dietel; Glen Kristiansen; Mark A Rubin Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2010-01-29 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: F McCarthy; A Fletcher; N Dennis; C Cummings; H O'Donnell; J Clark; P Flohr; R Vergis; S Jhavar; C Parker; C S Cooper Journal: J Clin Pathol Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 3.411