Literature DB >> 19040446

Clinical and radiographic characteristics of single-tooth replacements preceded by local ridge augmentation: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

L Meijndert1, G M Raghoebar, H J A Meijer, A Vissink.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess in a randomized-clinical trial the influence of three augmentation techniques (chinbone with or without a Bio-Gide membrane and Bio-Oss with a Bio-Gide membrane) on the clinical and radiographic characteristics of hard and soft tissues around implants and adjacent teeth in the reconstructed maxillary anterior region, up to 1 year after functional loading.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-three patients requesting single-tooth replacement and presenting with a horizontal (bucco-palatinal) bone deficiency were included. After augmentation, 93 ITI-Esthetic(Plus) implants were placed. Clinical variables, standardized photographs and radiographs were analysed to assess the impact on the levels of the marginal gingiva (MGL) and marginal bone (MBL) around implants and adjacent teeth, viz at pre-augmentation, pre-implantation (TPI) and 1 (T(1)) and 12 (T(12)) months after final crown placement.
RESULTS: Implant survival was 97.8%. No significant differences were observed in the treatment outcomes of the three augmentation modalities. Combining the three modalities, a slight but significant increase in the implants approximal pocket depth was found between T(1) and T(12). Approximal bone loss at the implant between T(1) and T(12) was 0.14 +/- 0.76 mm (mesial) and 0.14 +/- 0.47 mm (distal); the approximal MGL slightly increased (mesial: 0.24 +/- 0.46 mm, distal: 0.25 +/- 0.66 mm), and the buccal MGL decreased (0.11 +/- 0.61 mm). Bone loss at the adjacent teeth, although minor, was significant between TPI and T(1). No correlations were observed in changes of MBL and MGL.
CONCLUSIONS: None of the three applied augmentation technique procedures influenced the characteristics of the MGL and MBL or the implant survival of single-tooth replacements. Peri-implant hard and soft tissues were very stable in the first year after loading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19040446     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01523.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  6 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment.

Authors:  Marco Esposito; Maria Gabriella Grusovin; Pietro Felice; Georgios Karatzopoulos; Helen V Worthington; Paul Coulthard
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-10-07

2.  Alveolar ridge augmentation using chin bone graft, bovine bone mineral, and titanium mesh: Clinical, histological, and histomorphomtric study.

Authors:  Jihad Khamees; Mohammad Atef Darwiche; Nabil Kochaji
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2012-04

Review 3.  The outcome of intraoral onlay block bone grafts on alveolar ridge augmentations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amparo Aloy-Prósper; David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Maria Peñarrocha-Diago; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2015-03-01

Review 4.  Lateral Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with an Autogenous Bone Block Graft Alone with or without Barrier Membrane Coverage: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Romario Gorgis; Lianna Qazo; Niels Henrik Bruun; Thomas Starch-Jensen
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2021-09-30

5.  Comparison of fibronectin in human marginal gingiva and interdental papilla using immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Mohammad Tavakoli; Ensiyeh Bateni; Fazeleh Attarbashi-Moghadam; Ardeshir Talebi; Jaber Yaghini; Ahmad Mogharehabed
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2011-12

Review 6.  Survival Rates of Dental Implants in Autogenous and Allogeneic Bone Blocks: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Phil Donkiewicz; Korbinian Benz; Anita Kloss-Brandstätter; Jochen Jackowski
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.