Literature DB >> 19040442

Tibial versus iliac bone grafts: a comparative examination in 15 freshly preserved adult cadavers.

Marcus Gerressen1, Andreas Prescher, Dieter Riediger, David van der Ven, Alireza Ghassemi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared autogenous bone grafts from the proximal tibia and the anterior iliac crest under standardized conditions with regard to the attainable bone amount and the histological bone density.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 15 freshly preserved adult cadavers, a corticocancellous block graft from the anterior iliac crest and a purely cancellous transplant from the tibia of the homolateral side were harvested respectively, with the length of the skin incision set at 6 cm for the iliac and at 3.5 cm for the tibial approach. The size of the iliac graft was defined to be between 1/3 and 1/4 of the total iliac length. At the medial tibia the maximum possible amount of cancellous bone was collected after preparation of a cortical lid. For volume determination grafts were cautiously cut up and then put in a water-filled measuring cylinder. In addition, bone density was measured by histomorphometry. The received data were statistically evaluated using the t-test for related samples at P=0.05 and Pearson's correlation analysis.
RESULTS: From both donor sites approximately equal amounts of bone were available. This result is neither dependent on age nor on gender. In contrast, bone density turned out significantly higher in the iliac graft, with the difference showing a significant age dependence (r=-0.556).
CONCLUSIONS: Provided that no cortical transplants are needed, cancellous tibial bone grafts offer an appropriate alternative to the classic iliac bone graft, especially in elderly patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19040442     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01621.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  8 in total

1.  Microcomputed tomography analysis of particular autogenous bone graft in sinus augmentation at 5 months: differences on bone mineral density and 3D trabecular structure.

Authors:  Heng-Li Huang; Jui-Ting Hsu; Michael Y C Chen; Cheng Liu; Ching-Han Chang; Yu-Fen Li; Kuan-Ting Chen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  [Bone substitutes used for sinus lift].

Authors:  T Kamm; S Kamm; W Heppt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Tibial Bone Grafting for Wrist Reconstruction.

Authors:  Schneider K Rancy; Stephanie D Malliaris; Scott W Wolfe
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2016-07-21

4.  Mandibular Reconstruction with Lateral Tibial Bone Graft: An Excellent Option for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Ana Lucia Carpi Miceli; Livia Costa Pereira; Thiago da Silva Torres; Mônica Diuana Calasans-Maia; Rafael Seabra Louro
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2016-11-01

5.  Similarities and Differences of Induced Membrane Technique Versus Wrap Bone Graft Technique.

Authors:  Yongwei Wu; Yongjun Rui; Qudong Yin; Zihong Zhou; Sanjun Gu; Fengfeng Li
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Use of a trephine bur and curette for minimally invasive harvesting of particulate cancellous bone and marrow from the iliac crest: a case of alveolar ridge reconstruction.

Authors:  Yukimori Isoda; Eisaku Imamura; Daisuke Ueno; Tsubasa Akaike; Yoshiki Hamada
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2016-01-04

7.  More weighted cancellous bone can be harvested from the proximal tibia with less donor site pain than anterior iliac crest corticocancellous bone harvesting: retrospective review.

Authors:  Hanju Kim; Ajit Kumar Kar; Aditya Kaja; Eic Ju Lim; Wonseok Choi; Whee Sung Son; Jong-Keon Oh; Seungyeob Sakong; Jae-Woo Cho
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Approaches to proximal tibial bone harvest techniques.

Authors:  Brion Benninger; Alan Ross; Taylor Delamarter
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2012-07-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.