Literature DB >> 19039823

Screening for triploidy by the risk algorithms for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 at 11 weeks to 13 weeks and 6 days of gestation.

Karl O Kagan1, James M Anderson, Gabriel Anwandter, Katya Neksasova, Kypros H Nicolaides.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness in screening for triploidy at 11 weeks to 13 weeks and 6 days of gestation by the combined use of the risk algorithms for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 based on maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency (NT) thickness, fetal heart rate (FHR) and maternal serum free beta-hCG and PAPP-A.
METHODS: Prospective screening for trisomy 21, including 56 376 normal singleton pregnancies and 31 cases with triploidy (24 digynic and 7 diandric). Patient-specific risks for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 were calculated by multiplying the age related risk for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 with the likelihood ratio (LR) for fetal NT and with a combined LR for FHR, free beta-hCG and PAPP-A, respectively. Detection rates (DRs) and false positive rates (FPRs) for triploidy were calculated by taking the proportion with risks above a given risk threshold and standardized for maternal age according to the distribution of pregnancies in England and Wales in 2000 to 2002.
RESULTS: In digynic triploidy, free beta-hCG was 0.16 (range 0.02-0.95) MoM and PAPP-A was 0.06 (range 0.02-0.47) MoM and the respective values for diandric triploidy were 8.74 (range 2.83-47.0) and 0.74 (range 0.32-1.51) MoM. Use of the trisomy 21 algorithm identified 5 of the 7 diandric cases and 3 of the 24 digynic ones at a 3% FPR. Combined use of the risk algorithms for trisomies 18 and 13 identified 20 of the 24 cases with the digynic triploidy at the FPR of 0.2%. When screen positivity was defined by a 3% FPR using the algorithm for trisomy 21 and an additional 0.2% FPR using the algorithms for trisomies 18 and 13, the total FPR was 3.1% and the DR was 84%.
CONCLUSIONS: A beneficial side-effect of first trimester combined screening for trisomies is the detection of a high proportion of fetuses with triploidy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19039823     DOI: 10.1002/pd.2149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  11 in total

1.  The maternal plasma proteome changes as a function of gestational age in normal pregnancy: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Roberto Romero; Offer Erez; Eli Maymon; Piya Chaemsaithong; Zhonghui Xu; Percy Pacora; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Bogdan Done; Sonia S Hassan; Adi L Tarca
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  A case of triploidy detected by crosstrimester test.

Authors:  Paolo Guanciali-Franchi; Irene Iezzi; Barbara Matarrelli; Elisena Morizio; Giuseppe Calabrese; Giandomenico Palka
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2012-07

Review 3.  First trimester ultrasound tests alone or in combination with first trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-15

Review 4.  First and second trimester serum tests with and without first trimester ultrasound tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-15

Review 5.  First trimester prediction of preeclampsia.

Authors:  Ulrik Dolberg Anderson; Magnus Gram; Bo Åkerström; Stefan R Hansson
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.369

6.  Prenatal sonographic features can accurately determine parental origin in triploid pregnancies.

Authors:  Malou A Lugthart; Judith Horenblas; Emily C Kleinrouweler; Melanie Engels; Alida C Knegt; Karin Huijsdens; Elisabeth van Leeuwen; Eva Pajkrt
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Prenatal Screening Markers for Down Syndrome: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Expected Value Method.

Authors:  Jasmina Durković; Milan Ubavić; Milica Durković; Tibor Kis
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  Non-invasive prenatal screening: A 20-year experience in Italy.

Authors:  Chiara Palka; Paolo Guanciali-Franchi; Elisena Morizio; Melissa Alfonsi; Marco Papponetti; Giulia Sabbatinelli; Giandomenico Palka; Giuseppe Calabrese; Peter Benn
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-05-18

Review 9.  First trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-30

10.  Maternal complications in molecularly confirmed diandric and digynic triploid pregnancies: single institution experience and literature review.

Authors:  D Massalska; J Bijok; A Kucińska-Chahwan; J G Zimowski; K Ozdarska; A Raniszewska; G M Panek; T Roszkowski
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 2.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.