OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of radiosynoviorthesis (RSO) in relation to joint type and underlying disease by both self-assessment of patients and scintigraphic assessment to determine conditions under which RSO might be preferable to the sole intra-articular corticoid injection. METHODS: Radiosynoviorthesis was performed on 136 patients for 424 joints [242 small, 130 medium-sized, and 52 large joints; 313 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and 111 with osteoarthritis (OA)]. The success of RSO was evaluated after 12 months by patients' estimation, and in 35 patients for 157 joints additionally by two-phase bone scintigraphy. The relative change in the scintigraphic uptake was compared with the patients' estimation. RESULTS: The subjectively estimated success rates for the small, medium-sized, and large joints were 89% (215/242), 86% (112/130), and 79% (41/52), and for RA and OA 89% (280/313) and 79% (88/111), respectively. The scintigraphically determined response rates for small and medium-sized joints were 81% (86/106) and 69% (35/51), respectively. There was a mismatch between patients' assessment and scintigraphic assessments in 18% (28/157) with 6 false-negative and 22 false-positive estimations using scintigraphy as the standard of reference. CONCLUSIONS: The success of RSO is higher in patients with RA than in patients with OA. For the finger, ankle, and wrist joints in RA, RSO is so promising that we would like to advocate its preference over the sole intraarticular corticoid injection. Perfusion bone scintigraphy can be used for therapy monitoring and earlier switching to RSO by showing that other therapies have failed.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of radiosynoviorthesis (RSO) in relation to joint type and underlying disease by both self-assessment of patients and scintigraphic assessment to determine conditions under which RSO might be preferable to the sole intra-articular corticoid injection. METHODS: Radiosynoviorthesis was performed on 136 patients for 424 joints [242 small, 130 medium-sized, and 52 large joints; 313 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and 111 with osteoarthritis (OA)]. The success of RSO was evaluated after 12 months by patients' estimation, and in 35 patients for 157 joints additionally by two-phase bone scintigraphy. The relative change in the scintigraphic uptake was compared with the patients' estimation. RESULTS: The subjectively estimated success rates for the small, medium-sized, and large joints were 89% (215/242), 86% (112/130), and 79% (41/52), and for RA and OA 89% (280/313) and 79% (88/111), respectively. The scintigraphically determined response rates for small and medium-sized joints were 81% (86/106) and 69% (35/51), respectively. There was a mismatch between patients' assessment and scintigraphic assessments in 18% (28/157) with 6 false-negative and 22 false-positive estimations using scintigraphy as the standard of reference. CONCLUSIONS: The success of RSO is higher in patients with RA than in patients with OA. For the finger, ankle, and wrist joints in RA, RSO is so promising that we would like to advocate its preference over the sole intraarticular corticoid injection. Perfusion bone scintigraphy can be used for therapy monitoring and earlier switching to RSO by showing that other therapies have failed.
Authors: Margit Szentesi; Zoltán Nagy; Pal Géher; István Papp; Willm Uwe Kampen Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-05-25 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Amir Sabet; Andreas Christian Strauss; Jan Schmolders; Rahel Bornemann; Amin Sabet; Johannes Oldenburg; Peter Hans Pennekamp; Hans Juergen Biersack; Samer Ezziddin Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-10-28 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Jens Schaumburger; Stefanie Trum; Sven Anders; Johannes Beckmann; Sebastian Winkler; Hans-Robert Springorum; Joachim Grifka; Philipp Lechler Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2011-09-17 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Jamshid Farahati; Johanna Elliott; Sabrina Höppner; Linda Stein; Elena Gilman; Dietmar Kumm; Thomas Grodotzki Journal: Clin Case Rep Date: 2017-05-12
Authors: W U Kampen; B Boddenberg-Pätzold; M Fischer; M Gabriel; R Klett; M Konijnenberg; E Kresnik; H Lellouche; F Paycha; L Terslev; C Turkmen; F van der Zant; L Antunovic; E Panagiotidis; G Gnanasegaran; T Kuwert; T Van den Wyngaert Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-10-20 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Karanvir S Aulakh; Mandi J Lopez; Caleb Hudson; Lorrie Gaschen; Michelle Fabiani; Brian Beale; Frank M Andrews; Chin-Chi Liu; Jimmy Lattimer Journal: Vet Med (Auckl) Date: 2021-06-04
Authors: Ibrahim Karaman; Ahmet Guney; Fatih Dogar; Ibrahim Halil Kafadar; Okkes Bilal; Mithat Oner; Mustafa Kula Journal: Med Princ Pract Date: 2014-08-29 Impact factor: 1.927