Literature DB >> 19039498

H-index in the Brazilian Academy of Sciences: comments and concerns.

Alexander W A Kellner1, Luiza C M O Ponciano.   

Abstract

Bibliometric parameters have been used in order to evaluate a scientist's performance. The h-index has been gradually accepted as the most adequate parameter for this purpose. To have an idea of this index among Brazilian scientists, we performed an analysis of this parameter for the full members of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences (BAS). The h-index of 402 members listed in 10 distinct categories by the BAS was determined, cross-checked with the curriculum vitae of each of them listed at the Plataforma Lattes database (CVL) and compared with each other. Despite the large production, mostly in journals without impact factor, the h-indexes among the BAS members are comparatively low and show a large variation in all of the 10 categories, particularly in Biomedical and Physical sciences. The highest average of h-index values was found in Biomedical, Health and Chemical sciences; the lowest values were found in Human sciences where this index is meaningless. Several problems due to the trend that new and "fresh" publications need be constantly produced (the "bakery-effect") are discussed. This study points to the need of developing countries such as Brazil to invest in national scientific journals in order to make them gradually part of the mainstream journals. This would have a positive effect on bibliometric parameters of Brazilian researchers, including the h-index.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19039498     DOI: 10.1590/s0001-37652008000400016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  An Acad Bras Cienc        ISSN: 0001-3765            Impact factor:   1.753


  6 in total

Review 1.  How has healthcare research performance been assessed?: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vanash M Patel; Hutan Ashrafian; Kamran Ahmed; Sonal Arora; Sejal Jiwan; Jeremy K Nicholson; Ara Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Characterizing scientific production of Italian Oral Surgery professionals through evaluation of bibliometric indices.

Authors:  Stefano Tetè; Vincenzo Luca Zizzari; Alessandro De Carlo; Felice Lorusso; Marta Di Nicola; Adriano Piattelli; Enrico Gherlone; Antonella Polimeni
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2014-03-31

3.  Productivity of CNPq Researchers from Different Fields in Biomedical Sciences: The Need for Objective Bibliometric Parameters-A Report from Brazil.

Authors:  Jean Paul Kamdem; Daniel Henrique Roos; Adekunle Adeniran Sanmi; Luciana Calabró; Amos Olalekan Abolaji; Cláudia Sirlene de Oliveira; Luiz Marivando Barros; Antonia Eliene Duarte; Nilda Vargas Barbosa; Diogo Onofre Souza; João Batista Teixeira Rocha
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  The Hirsch index - a play on numbers or a true appraisal of academic output?

Authors:  Taimur Saleem
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2011-07-07

5.  Becoming metrics literate: An analysis of brief videos that teach about the h-index.

Authors:  Lauren A Maggio; Alyssa Jeffrey; Stefanie Haustein; Anita Samuel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Bibliometric profile of the African Academy of Sciences medical and health sciences fellows.

Authors:  Joseph Balogun; Efe Mamuzo; Friday Okonofua; Adetutu Balogun; Adetoyeje Oyeyemi
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2021-01-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.