Literature DB >> 19038472

Health information technology and physician perceptions of quality of care and satisfaction.

Karen Davis1, Michelle McEvoy Doty, Katherine Shea, Kristof Stremikis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine across seven countries the relationship between physician office information system capacity and the quality of care.
DESIGN: Multivariate analysis of a cross-sectional 2006 random survey of primary care physicians in seven countries: Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, United Kingdom, and United States. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: coordination and safety of care, care for chronically ill patients, and satisfaction with practice of medicine.
RESULTS: The study finds significant disparities in the quality of health care between practices with low information system capacity and those with high technical capacity after controlling for within country differences and practice size. There were significant physician satisfaction differences with the overall experience of practicing medicine by information system level.
CONCLUSIONS: For policy leaders, the seven-nation survey suggests that health systems that promote information system infrastructure are better able to address coordination and safety issues, particularly for patients with multiple chronic conditions, as well as to maintain primary care physician workforce satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19038472     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  20 in total

1.  Trends in the use of electronic medical records.

Authors:  Suzanne C Biro; David T Barber; Jyoti A Kotecha
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Design and development of EMR supporting medical process management.

Authors:  Jing-Song Li; Xiao-Guang Zhang; Jian Chu; Muneou Suzuki; Kenji Araki
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  The health information technology provisions in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: implications for public health policy and practice.

Authors:  Taylor Burke
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Email communication at the medical primary-secondary care interface: a qualitative exploration.

Authors:  Rod Sampson; Rosaline Barbour; Philip Wilson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Performance assessment of EMR systems based on post-relational database.

Authors:  Hai-Yan Yu; Jing-Song Li; Xiao-Guang Zhang; Yu Tian; Muneou Suzuki; Kenji Araki
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Transitioning between ambulatory EHRs: a study of practitioners' perspectives.

Authors:  Stephanie O Zandieh; Erika L Abramson; Elizabeth R Pfoh; Kay Yoon-Flannery; Alison Edwards; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  The use of quality improvement and health information technology approaches to improve diabetes outcomes in African American and Hispanic patients.

Authors:  Arshiya A Baig; Abigail E Wilkes; Andrew M Davis; Monica E Peek; Elbert S Huang; Douglas S Bell; Marshall H Chin
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 8.  Personal health records: a scoping review.

Authors:  N Archer; U Fevrier-Thomas; C Lokker; K A McKibbon; S E Straus
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Integrating telemedicine in urban pediatric primary care: provider perspectives and performance.

Authors:  Kenneth McConnochie; Nancy Wood; Neil Herendeen; Cynthia ten Hoopen; Larry Denk; Judith Neuderfer
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.536

10.  An exploratory, population-based, mixed-methods program evaluation of user satisfaction of services provided by a regional extension center (REC).

Authors:  D Tang; M Rutala; C Ihde; A Bills; L Mollon; T Warholak
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.