Literature DB >> 19038293

Field preservation and DNA extraction methods for intestinal microbial diversity analysis in earthworms.

Dwipendra Thakuria1, Olaf Schmidt, Ann-Kathrin Liliensiek, Damian Egan, Fiona M Doohan.   

Abstract

We assessed the effect of DNA extraction and sample preservation methods on the DNA yield and quality obtained from earthworm (Aporrectodea caliginosa Savigny) gut samples and on the results obtained by bacterial and fungal automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA) of DNA extracts. Methods based on a hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide dithiotreitol (CTAB-DTT) extraction buffer yielded more favourable results than those based on a sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) buffer. For both of these buffers, incorporation of a bead-beating during the lysis step increased the ARISA-derived bacterial ribotype numbers and diversity estimates, as determined for gut wall samples (P<0.01). Although spectrophotometric analysis indicated that DNA extracted by the CTAB-DTT and SDS-based methods were of comparable quality (P> or =0.05), the former method yielded >1.5 times more DNA from both gut contents and gut walls of earthworms than the latter method (both incorporating the bead beating step) (P<0.01). ARISA analysis detected more reproducible ribotypes and more microbial diversity in DNA extracted by the CTAB-DTT- as compared to the SDS-based method (P<0.01). Significant difference between bacterial communities of gut contents and gut walls were detected within DNA extracted by the CTAB-DTT (but not by the SDS-based) method (Global R=0.76, P<0.001, analysis of similarity). Using the CTAB-DTT-based method, we showed that earthworm preservation in ethanol yielded higher quality DNA from gut contents than preservation in either chloroform or liquid N, as determined by spectrophotometry, PCR inhibition analysis and bacterial and fungal ARISA (P<0.05). Bacterial or fungal communities in the gut contents of fresh and ethanol-preserved earthworms were more similar and were significantly different from those of earthworms preserved in chloroform or liquid N (Global R=0.79 and 0.83 for bacteria and fungi, respectively; P<0.001, analysis of similarity). We propose that ethanol preservation and the CTAB-DTT-based DNA extraction method described herein are also suitable for the analysis of gut-associated microbiota in other soil and sediment feeding invertebrates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19038293     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  6 in total

1.  Effect of dietary prebiotic (mannan oligosaccharide) supplementation on the caecal bacterial community structure of turkeys.

Authors:  A Corrigan; K Horgan; N Clipson; R A Murphy
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Land cover and forest connectivity alter the interactions among host, pathogen and skin microbiome.

Authors:  C G Becker; A V Longo; C F B Haddad; K R Zamudio
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Effect of dietary supplementation with a Saccharomyces cerevisiae mannan oligosaccharide on the bacterial community structure of broiler cecal contents.

Authors:  A Corrigan; K Horgan; N Clipson; R A Murphy
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Effects of scale worm parasitism on interactions between the symbiotic gill microbiome and gene regulation in deep sea mussel hosts.

Authors:  Gaoyou Yao; Hua Zhang; Panpan Xiong; Huixia Jia; Maoxian He
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 6.064

5.  Seasonal and ontogenetic variation of skin microbial communities and relationships to natural disease dynamics in declining amphibians.

Authors:  Ana V Longo; Anna E Savage; Ian Hewson; Kelly R Zamudio
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Direct 16S rRNA-seq from bacterial communities: a PCR-independent approach to simultaneously assess microbial diversity and functional activity potential of each taxon.

Authors:  Riccardo Rosselli; Ottavia Romoli; Nicola Vitulo; Alessandro Vezzi; Stefano Campanaro; Fabio de Pascale; Riccardo Schiavon; Maurizio Tiarca; Fabio Poletto; Giuseppe Concheri; Giorgio Valle; Andrea Squartini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.