Literature DB >> 19036979

Sequential generation of two distinct synapse-driven network patterns in developing neocortex.

Camille Allène1, Adriano Cattani, James B Ackman, Paolo Bonifazi, Laurent Aniksztejn, Yehezkel Ben-Ari, Rosa Cossart.   

Abstract

Developing cortical networks generate a variety of coherent activity patterns that participate in circuit refinement. Early network oscillations (ENOs) are the dominant network pattern in the rodent neocortex for a short period after birth. These large-scale calcium waves were shown to be largely driven by glutamatergic synapses albeit GABA is a major excitatory neurotransmitter in the cortex at such early stages, mediating synapse-driven giant depolarizing potentials (GDPs) in the hippocampus. Using functional multineuron calcium imaging together with single-cell and field potential recordings to clarify distinct network dynamics in rat cortical slices, we now report that the developing somatosensory cortex generates first ENOs then GDPs, both patterns coexisting for a restricted time period. These patterns markedly differ by their developmental profile, dynamics, and mechanisms: ENOs are generated before cortical GDPs (cGDPs) by the activation of glutamatergic synapses mostly through NMDARs; cENOs are low-frequency oscillations (approximately 0.01 Hz) displaying slow kinetics and gradually involving the entire network. At the end of the first postnatal week, GABA-driven cortical GDPs can be reliably monitored; cGDPs are recurrent oscillations (approximately 0.1 Hz) that repetitively synchronize localized neuronal assemblies. Contrary to cGDPs, cENOs were unexpectedly facilitated by short anoxic conditions suggesting a contribution of glutamate accumulation to their generation. In keeping with this, alterations of extracellular glutamate levels significantly affected cENOs, which are blocked by an enzymatic glutamate scavenger. Moreover, we show that a tonic glutamate current contributes to the neuronal membrane excitability when cENOs dominate network patterns. Therefore, cENOs and cGDPs are two separate aspects of neocortical network maturation that may be differentially engaged in physiological and pathological processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19036979      PMCID: PMC6671804          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3733-08.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  107 in total

1.  Cellular mechanisms underlying spatiotemporal features of cholinergic retinal waves.

Authors:  Kevin J Ford; Aude L Félix; Marla B Feller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  "Slow activity transients" in infant rat visual cortex: a spreading synchronous oscillation patterned by retinal waves.

Authors:  Matthew T Colonnese; Rustem Khazipov
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Neonatal CX26 removal impairs neocortical development and leads to elevated anxiety.

Authors:  Xin Su; Jing-Jing Chen; Lin-Yun Liu; Qian Huang; Li-Zhao Zhang; Xiao-Yang Li; Xiang-Nan He; Wenlian Lu; Shan Sun; Huawei Li; Yong-Chun Yu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  The developmental stages of synaptic plasticity.

Authors:  Christian Lohmann; Helmut W Kessels
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Neurophysiology of inhibitory and excitatory amino acid receptors.

Authors:  Derek Bowie; R Anne McKinney
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Differential expression of membrane conductances underlies spontaneous event initiation by rostral midline neurons in the embryonic mouse hindbrain.

Authors:  Audrey M Moruzzi; Nauzley C Abedini; Matthew A Hansen; Julia E Olson; Martha M Bosma
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-09-07       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  Early NMDA receptor-driven waves of activity in the developing neocortex: physiological or pathological network oscillations?

Authors:  Camille Allene; Rosa Cossart
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 8.  Spontaneous Network Activity and Synaptic Development.

Authors:  Daniel Kerschensteiner
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 7.519

9.  Astrocytic glutamate uptake is slow and does not limit neuronal NMDA receptor activation in the neonatal neocortex.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hanson; Moritz Armbruster; David Cantu; Lauren Andresen; Amaro Taylor; Niels Christian Danbolt; Chris G Dulla
Journal:  Glia       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 7.452

Review 10.  Mechanisms underlying spontaneous patterned activity in developing neural circuits.

Authors:  Aaron G Blankenship; Marla B Feller
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 34.870

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.