OBJECTIVE: This paper examines the hypothesis that the dermatan sulfate (DS) chain on decorin is a load carrying element in cartilage and that its damage or removal will alter the material properties. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, indentation and tensile testing of cartilage from bovine patella were performed before and after digestion with chondroitinase B (cB). Removal of significant amounts of DS by cB digestion was verified by Western blot analysis of proteoglycans extracted from whole and sectioned specimens. Specimens (control and treated) were subjected to a series of step-hold displacements. Elastic modulus during the step rise (rapid modulus) and at equilibrium (equilibrium modulus), and the relaxation function during each step was measured for test (cB and buffer) and control (buffer alone) conditions. RESULTS: cB had no effect on any of the viscoelastic mechanical properties measured, either in indentation or tension. CONCLUSION: Removing or damaging approximately 50% of the DS had no effect on the mechanical properties, strongly suggesting that DS either carries very low load or no load.
OBJECTIVE: This paper examines the hypothesis that the dermatan sulfate (DS) chain on decorin is a load carrying element in cartilage and that its damage or removal will alter the material properties. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, indentation and tensile testing of cartilage from bovinepatella were performed before and after digestion with chondroitinase B (cB). Removal of significant amounts of DS by cB digestion was verified by Western blot analysis of proteoglycans extracted from whole and sectioned specimens. Specimens (control and treated) were subjected to a series of step-hold displacements. Elastic modulus during the step rise (rapid modulus) and at equilibrium (equilibrium modulus), and the relaxation function during each step was measured for test (cB and buffer) and control (buffer alone) conditions. RESULTS: cB had no effect on any of the viscoelastic mechanical properties measured, either in indentation or tension. CONCLUSION: Removing or damaging approximately 50% of the DS had no effect on the mechanical properties, strongly suggesting that DS either carries very low load or no load.
Authors: R K Korhonen; M Wong; J Arokoski; R Lindgren; H J Helminen; E B Hunziker; J S Jurvelin Journal: Med Eng Phys Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 2.242
Authors: N Nakamura; D A Hart; R S Boorman; Y Kaneda; N G Shrive; L L Marchuk; K Shino; T Ochi; C B Frank Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Rami K Korhonen; Mikko S Laasanen; Juha Töyräs; Reijo Lappalainen; Heikki J Helminen; Jukka S Jurvelin Journal: J Biomech Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Dawn M Elliott; Paul S Robinson; Jonathan A Gimbel; Joseph J Sarver; Joseph A Abboud; Renato V Iozzo; Louis J Soslowsky Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Biao Han; Qing Li; Chao Wang; Pavan Patel; Sheila M Adams; Basak Doyran; Hadi T Nia; Ramin Oftadeh; Siyuan Zhou; Christopher Y Li; X Sherry Liu; X Lucas Lu; Motomi Enomoto-Iwamoto; Ling Qin; Robert L Mauck; Renato V Iozzo; David E Birk; Lin Han Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 15.881