OBJECTIVES: To analyze the relationship between plasma testosterone and estradiol levels on prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason scores in a cohort of patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. METHODS: Patients with prostate cancer evaluated at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute from 2001 to 2005 who were enrolled in a prospective sample banking protocol were eligible for this study. Stored plasma was processed for total testosterone, total estradiol, and sex hormone-binding globulin levels using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The frequency of high-grade biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason scores (>6) was the primary endpoint. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship between the hormone levels and high-grade Gleason scores while adjusting for sex hormone-binding globulin, age, body mass index, and prostate-specific antigen. RESULTS: A total of 539 patients were included in this study, 199 of whom underwent radical prostatectomy. The median prostate-specific antigen level was 5.1 ng/dL, and 67% of the cancers were not palpable. The Gleason score was 2-6, 7, and 8-10 in 53%, 37%, and 10% of the cancers, respectively. On univariate analysis of the high-grade biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score, the total testosterone, total estradiol, and estradiol-to-testosterone ratio were not significant as continuous or categorical variables. Adjusting these results for sex hormone-binding globulin level, body mass index, age, and prostate-specific antigen level did not change the conclusions, and these results were unchanged when categorizing high-grade prostate cancer as Gleason score 8-10. CONCLUSIONS: No relationship was found between the circulating steroid hormone levels and the Gleason score in this cohort.
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the relationship between plasma testosterone and estradiol levels on prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason scores in a cohort of patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. METHODS:Patients with prostate cancer evaluated at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute from 2001 to 2005 who were enrolled in a prospective sample banking protocol were eligible for this study. Stored plasma was processed for total testosterone, total estradiol, and sex hormone-binding globulin levels using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The frequency of high-grade biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason scores (>6) was the primary endpoint. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship between the hormone levels and high-grade Gleason scores while adjusting for sex hormone-binding globulin, age, body mass index, and prostate-specific antigen. RESULTS: A total of 539 patients were included in this study, 199 of whom underwent radical prostatectomy. The median prostate-specific antigen level was 5.1 ng/dL, and 67% of the cancers were not palpable. The Gleason score was 2-6, 7, and 8-10 in 53%, 37%, and 10% of the cancers, respectively. On univariate analysis of the high-grade biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score, the total testosterone, total estradiol, and estradiol-to-testosterone ratio were not significant as continuous or categorical variables. Adjusting these results for sex hormone-binding globulin level, body mass index, age, and prostate-specific antigen level did not change the conclusions, and these results were unchanged when categorizing high-grade prostate cancer as Gleason score 8-10. CONCLUSIONS: No relationship was found between the circulating steroid hormone levels and the Gleason score in this cohort.
Authors: Antonio B Porcaro; Nicolò De Luyk; Paolo Corsi; Marco Sebben; Alessandro Tafuri; Giovanni Cacciamani; Davide De Marchi; Irene Tamanini; Davide Inverardi; Matteo Brunelli; Maria A Cerruto; Gian L Salvagno; Gian C Guidi; Walter Artibani Journal: Curr Urol Date: 2017-05-30
Authors: Tong Sun; William K Oh; Susanna Jacobus; Meredith Regan; Mark Pomerantz; Matthew L Freedman; Gwo-Shu Mary Lee; Philip W Kantoff Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2011-09-07
Authors: Thomas Schnoeller; Florian Jentzmik; Ludwig Rinnab; Marcus V Cronauer; Ilija Damjanoski; Friedemann Zengerling; Andreas Al Ghazal; Mark Schrader; Andres J Schrader Journal: World J Urol Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Emanuela Taioli; Vestra Sears; Alexis Watson; Rafael E Flores-Obando; Maria D Jackson; Flora A Ukoli; Ilce M de Syllos Cólus; Pedro Fernandez; Norma McFarlane-Anderson; Elaine A Ostrander; Iara S Rodrigues; Janet L Stanford; Jack A Taylor; Marshall Tulloch-Reid; Camille C R Ragin Journal: Prostate Date: 2012-11-05 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Megan Dann Fesinmeyer; Roman Gulati; Steve Zeliadt; Noel Weiss; Alan R Kristal; Ruth Etzioni Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-03-03 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Antonio B Porcaro; Aldo Petrozziello; Matteo Brunelli; Filippo Migliorini; Giovanni Cacciamani; Davide De Marchi; Nicolo' de Luyk; Irene Tamanini; Beatrice Caruso; Maria A Cerruto; Claudio Ghimenton; Walter Artibani Journal: Asian J Urol Date: 2015-11-30