Literature DB >> 19035991

Evidence-based intrapartum care in Cali, Colombia: a quantitative and qualitative study.

A Conde-Agudelo1, A Rosas-Bermudez, A M Gülmezoglu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To measure the rate of use of selected intrapartum obstetric practices and to explore the factors associated with their use.
DESIGN: Prospective quantitative and qualitative study.
SETTING: Fifteen public and private hospitals in Cali, Colombia. SAMPLE: Quantitative arm: 1,767 low-risk women delivering a single live baby; qualitative arm: 36 intrapartum care providers.
METHODS: Quantitative analysis of women's clinical charts for measuring the rates of obstetric practices. Qualitative analysis of audiotaped semi-structured interviews with intrapartum care providers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of use of ten intrapartum obstetric practices and associated factors and intrapartum care providers' views on evidence-based obstetric practice.
RESULTS: Rates for the ineffective practices of enema use, perineal/pubic shaving, and routine intravenous infusion during labour were around 75%. Episiotomy rates for primiparae and multiparae were 70 and 22%, respectively. Rates for the beneficial practices of active management of the third stage of labour and allowing women's choice of position during the first stage of labour were around 45%. Companionship during labour, external cephalic version for breech presentation at term, and absorbable synthetic sutures for episiotomy showed rates of utilisation lower than 15%. Hospital characteristics, type of intrapartum care provider, and women's medical insurance status were associated with use of selected practices. Barriers and opportunities for implementing evidence-based practices in routine obstetric care were identified.
CONCLUSIONS: Intrapartum care in Cali, Colombia, is not guided by the best available evidence. Effective change strategies should be undertaken to encourage the adoption of obstetric practices clearly demonstrated as effective and to discard those that are ineffective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19035991     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01930.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  6 in total

Review 1.  Routine perineal shaving on admission in labour.

Authors:  Vittorio Basevi; Tina Lavender
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-11-14

Review 2.  Enemas during labour.

Authors:  Ludovic Reveiz; Hernando G Gaitán; Luis Gabriel Cuervo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-07-22

Review 3.  Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Susan Munabi-Babigumira; Claire Glenton; Simon Lewin; Atle Fretheim; Harriet Nabudere
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-17

4.  Barriers to Implementing Evidence-Based Intrapartum Care: A Descriptive Exploratory Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Mina Iravani; Mohsen Janghorbani; Ellahe Zarean; Masod Bahrami
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 0.611

5.  Nascer no Brasil: the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in delivery care in the South region of Brazil.

Authors:  Juliana Jacques da Costa Monguilhott; Odaléa Maria Brüggemann; Paulo Fontoura Freitas; Eleonora d'Orsi
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 2.106

Review 6.  Why are women dying when they reach hospital on time? A systematic review of the 'third delay'.

Authors:  Hannah E Knight; Alice Self; Stephen H Kennedy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.