Literature DB >> 1903574

Diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of 2DFT time-of-flight MR angiography with contrast angiography in 50 patients.

A W Litt1, E M Eidelman, R S Pinto, T S Riles, S J McLachlan, S Schwartzenberg, J C Weinreb, I I Kricheff.   

Abstract

Fifty patients underwent 2DFT time-of-flight MR angiography and intraarterial contrast angiography for evaluation of possible carotid atherosclerotic disease. The MR angiography technique employed contiguous axial flow-sensitive (short TR/TE) slices that were reformatted and postprocessed by using a maximum-intensity projection algorithm to provide 16 angiographic views of the carotid arteries. Both studies were independently reviewed by two observers in a blinded manner. Carotid arteries were categorized as normal, mildly stenotic, moderately stenotic, severely stenotic, or occluded. For the 94 carotid arteries available for review, one observer reported a 70% agreement between the two techniques and the second observer reported a 56% agreement (p = .0001). The best correlation was in the severely stenotic category and the worst was in the occluded category. Agreement between observers was 67% for MR angiography and 72% for contrast angiography, which was similar to that between the two techniques. Although not all carotid atherosclerotic disease was visualized equally well, 2DFT time-of-flight MR angiography had a good overall correlation with the "gold standard" of intraarterial contrast angiography, supporting its use as a screening technique. While further improvements are needed, use of MR angiography as the primary diagnostic tool for many patients with suspected carotid stenosis should continue to increase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1903574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  15 in total

Review 1.  Brain imaging.

Authors:  R I Grossman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Use of magnetic resonance angiography to select candidates with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis for surgery: systematic review.

Authors:  Marie E Westwood; Steven Kelly; Elizabeth Berry; John M Bamford; Michael J Gough; C Mark Airey; James F M Meaney; Linda M Davies; Jane Cullingworth; Michael A Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-01-26

Review 3.  Imaging of carotid artery disease: from luminology to function?

Authors:  J H Gillard
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Total occlusion versus hairline residual lumen of the internal carotid arteries: accuracy of single section helical CT angiography.

Authors:  Michael H Lev; Javier M Romero; Daniel N F Goodman; Ranjit Bagga; H Young Kwon Kim; Neil A Clerk; Robert H Ackerman; R Gilberto Gonzalez
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  MR imaging and angiography of primary CNS vasculitis of childhood.

Authors:  R I Aviv; S M Benseler; E D Silverman; P N Tyrrell; G Deveber; L M Tsang; D Armstrong
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography?

Authors:  R L Vanninen; H I Manninen; P K Partanen; H Tulla; P A Vainio
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Non-invasive diagnosis of traumatic occlusion of extracranial internal carotid artery by magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  A I Göçer; M Tuna; F Ildan; S Ozel; M Duranel
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Prospective evaluation of suspected stenoocclusive disease of the intracranial artery: combined MR angiography and CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Toshinori Hirai; Yukunori Korogi; Ken Ono; Masafumi Nagano; Kousei Maruoka; Shozaburo Uemura; Mutsumasa Takahashi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Angiography of primary central nervous system angiitis of childhood: conventional angiography versus magnetic resonance angiography at presentation.

Authors:  R I Aviv; S M Benseler; G DeVeber; E D Silverman; P N Tyrrell; L M Tsang; D Armstrong
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Magnetic resonance angiography of supratentorial tumours: comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  G Wilms; H Bosmans; G Marchal; P Demaerel; J Goffin; C Plets; A L Baert
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.