Literature DB >> 19035530

Bounds on natural direct effects in the presence of confounded intermediate variables.

Arvid Sjölander1.   

Abstract

In epidemiological studies we often want to learn about the direct effect of an exposure on an outcome, i.e. the effect that is not relayed by a specific intermediate variable. In the literature, there are two common definitions of direct effects; controlled and natural. When the intermediate variable and the outcome have common causes, neither the controlled nor the natural direct effect is identified. Cai et al. (Biometrics 2007; 64(3):695-701) derived bounds for the controlled direct effect under a set of hierarchical assumptions. In this paper we derive bounds on the natural direct effect under the same assumptions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19035530     DOI: 10.1002/sim.3493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  10 in total

1.  The causal mediation formula--a guide to the assessment of pathways and mechanisms.

Authors:  Judea Pearl
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2012-08

2.  Nonparametric Bounds and Sensitivity Analysis of Treatment Effects.

Authors:  Amy Richardson; Michael G Hudgens; Peter B Gilbert; Jason P Fine
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.901

3.  Sharp sensitivity bounds for mediation under unmeasured mediator-outcome confounding.

Authors:  Peng Ding; Tyler J Vanderweele
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 2.445

Review 4.  Principal stratification--a goal or a tool?

Authors:  Judea Pearl
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 0.968

5.  A complete graphical criterion for the adjustment formula in mediation analysis.

Authors:  Ilya Shpitser; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 0.968

6.  Improved diabetes control in the elderly delays global cognitive decline.

Authors:  J A Luchsinger; W Palmas; J A Teresi; S Silver; J Kong; J P Eimicke; R S Weinstock; S Shea
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.075

7.  Mediation analysis for count and zero-inflated count data.

Authors:  Jing Cheng; Nancy F Cheng; Zijian Guo; Steven Gregorich; Amid I Ismail; Stuart A Gansky
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-01-08       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  Sensitivity analysis for direct and indirect effects in the presence of exposure-induced mediator-outcome confounders.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele; Yasutaka Chiba
Journal:  Epidemiol Biostat Public Health       Date:  2014

9.  Causal mediation analysis with multiple causally non-ordered mediators.

Authors:  Masataka Taguri; John Featherstone; Jing Cheng
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.021

10.  Examining the role of unmeasured confounding in mediation analysis with genetic and genomic applications.

Authors:  Sharon M Lutz; Annie Thwing; Sarah Schmiege; Miranda Kroehl; Christopher D Baker; Anne P Starling; John E Hokanson; Debashis Ghosh
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.