Literature DB >> 19034804

Meta-analysis of qualitative studies: a tool for reviewing qualitative research findings in psychotherapy.

Ladislav Timulak1.   

Abstract

This article focuses on the presentation of qualitative meta-analysis as a method for reviewing qualitative studies. Qualitative meta-analysis is an attempt to conduct a rigorous secondary qualitative analysis of primary qualitative findings. Its purpose*to provide a more comprehensive description of a phenomenon and an assessment of the influence of the method of investigation on findings*is discussed. The distinctive features of conducting meta-analysis approaches are presented. Several considerations important for conducting qualitative meta-analysis are also discussed. The author uses examples of the first experiences attempted with qualitative meta-analysis in the field of psychotherapy research.

Mesh：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19034804     DOI： 10.1080/10503300802477989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychother Res        ISSN： 1050-3307


  19 in total

Review 1.  Promoting influenza vaccination: insights from a qualitative meta-analysis of 14 years of influenza-related communications research by U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Authors:  Glen J Nowak; Kristine Sheedy; Kelli Bursey; Teresa M Smith; Michelle Basket
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 2.  Practical recommendations to conduct a neuroimaging meta-analysis for neuropsychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Masoud Tahmasian; Amir A Sepehry; Fateme Samea; Tina Khodadadifar; Zahra Soltaninejad; Nooshin Javaheripour; Habibolah Khazaie; Mojtaba Zarei; Simon B Eickhoff; Claudia R Eickhoff
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Prognostic value of endocan expression in cancers: evidence from meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xing Huang; Chen Chen; Xin Wang; Jing-Yuan Zhang; Bin-Hui Ren; Da-Wei Ma; Lei Xia; Xin-Yu Xu; Lin Xu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Patient experiences of psychological therapy for depression: a qualitative metasynthesis.

Authors:  Susan McPherson; Claire Wicks; Ilaria Tercelli
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.630

5.  Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of S100A14 expression in cancer patients: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lixia Hu; Fanliang Kong; Yueyin Pan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Clients' Experiences With Internet-Based Psychological Treatments for Mental Disorders: Protocol for a Metasynthesis of Qualitative Studies.

Authors:  Javier Fernández-Álvarez; Amanda Díaz-García; Mª Dolores Vara; Guadalupe Molinari; Desirée Colombo; Giuseppe Riva; Rosa M Baños; Cristina Botella
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2018-11-21

7.  The patient at the centre: evidence from 17 European integrated care programmes for persons with complex needs.

Authors:  Thomas Czypionka; Markus Kraus; Miriam Reiss; Erik Baltaxe; Josep Roca; Sabine Ruths; Jonathan Stokes; Verena Struckmann; Romana Tandara Haček; Antal Zemplényi; Maaike Hoedemakers; Maureen Rutten-van Mölken
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Narrative reviews.

Authors:  Jong-Myon Bae
Journal:  Epidemiol Health       Date:  2014-09-11

Review 9.  Identifying fundamental criteria for eating disorder recovery: a systematic review and qualitative meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jan Alexander de Vos; Andrea LaMarre; Mirjam Radstaak; Charlotte Ariane Bijkerk; Ernst T Bohlmeijer; Gerben J Westerhof
Journal:  J Eat Disord       Date:  2017-11-01

10.  Consequences of health condition labelling: protocol for a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Rebecca Sims; Luise Kazda; Zoe A Michaleff; Paul Glasziou; Rae Thomas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.692
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.