Literature DB >> 19034785

Studying work practices: a key factor in understanding accidents on the level triggered by a balance disturbance.

C Derosier1, S Leclercq, P Rabardel, P Langa.   

Abstract

Accidents on the level (AOL) rank second amongst the most numerous and serious occupational accidents with days lost in France and are a major health and safety problem in every sector of activity. The case study described in this paper was conducted at a metallurgical company with 300 employees. The aims of this work were dual: 1) to extend the general knowledge required for preventing these accidents; 2) to propose prevention measures to this company. Existing data on company occupational accidents were gathered and analysed to identify a work situation that appeared likely to cause AOL. This work situation was analysed in detail. Several risk factors were identified within this work situation, by way of interviews with 12 operators. These risk factors concerned various dimensions of the work situation, particularly its physical dimension (e.g. templates structure) and organisational dimension (e.g. parts availability). Interviews were conducted, focusing on risk factors perceived by operators and involving allo-confrontations based on accounts of four AOL occurring in this situation. Allo-confrontations were interviews confronting operators with a risk occupational situation that was accidental for one of their colleagues, the latter being absent from the interview. Results highlighted the fact that the work practices implemented are key factors in understanding these accidents. This study underlines the role of work practices in AOL causality and prevention. It also provides explanations associated with various work situation dimensions involving adoption of more or less safe work practices. AOL are serious and frequent in occupational situations. Injury claims analysis and interviews in an industrial company emphasise the specific characteristics of an occupational situation and of prevention actions forming the basis of an intervention. The need for a better understanding of factors affecting work practice is highlighted in relation to research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19034785     DOI: 10.1080/00140130802567061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

Review 1.  Noise and neurotoxic chemical exposure relationship to workplace traumatic injuries: A review.

Authors:  Cheryl Fairfield Estill; Carol H Rice; Thais Morata; Amit Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2016-12-08

2.  Stimulated recall methodology for assessing work system barriers and facilitators in family-centered rounds in a pediatric hospital.

Authors:  Pascale Carayon; Yaqiong Li; Michelle M Kelly; Lori L DuBenske; Anping Xie; Brenna McCabe; Jason Orne; Elizabeth D Cox
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 3.  Organisational factors of occupational accidents with movement disturbance (OAMD) and prevention.

Authors:  Sylvie Leclercq
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 2.179

Review 4.  State of science: occupational slips, trips and falls on the same level.

Authors:  Wen-Ruey Chang; Sylvie Leclercq; Thurmon E Lockhart; Roger Haslam
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.778

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.