Literature DB >> 19034693

Piercing the veil: ethical issues in ethnographic research.

Brian Schrag1.   

Abstract

It is not unusual for researchers in ethnography (and sometimes Institutional Review Boards) to assume that research of "public" behavior is morally unproblematic. I examine an historical case of ethnographic research and the sustained moral outrage to the research expressed by the subjects of that research. I suggest that the moral outrage was legitimate and articulate some of the ethical issues underlying that outrage. I argue that morally problematic Ethnographic research of public behavior can derive from research practice that includes a tendency to collapse the distinction between harm and moral wrong, a failure to take account of recent work on ethical issues in privacy; failure to appreciate the deception involved in ethnographers' failure to reveal their role as researchers to subjects and finally a failure to appropriately weigh the moral significance of issues of invasion of privacy and inflicted insight in both the research process and subsequent publication of research.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19034693     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-008-9105-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  6 in total

1.  IRBs and social science research: the costs of deception.

Authors:  Diana Baumrind
Journal:  IRB       Date:  1979-10

2.  Psychological and social risks of behavioral research.

Authors:  Susan M Labott; Timothy P Johnson
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2004 May-Jun

3.  Research with groups: group rights, group consent, and collaborative research commentary on "Protecting the Navajo People through tribal regulation of research".

Authors:  Brian Schrag
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 4.  Risks and wrongs in social science research. An evaluator's guide to the IRB.

Authors:  J Michael Oakes
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2002-10

5.  Ethical review of interpretive research: problems and solutions.

Authors:  Nora Jacobson; Rebecca Gewurtz; Emma Haydon
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct

6.  Human research protections: time for regulatory reform?

Authors:  Karen J Maschke
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Can significant differences in regulating medical and non-medical research be justified?

Authors:  David Hunter
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2014 Sep-Dec

2.  Promoting human subjects training for place-based communities and cultural groups in environmental research: curriculum approaches for graduate student/faculty training.

Authors:  Dianne Quigley
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.525

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.