Literature DB >> 19034479

The learning curve for primary vitrectomy without scleral buckling for pseudophakic retinal detachment.

Brice Dugas1, Pierre-Olivier Lafontaine, Alexandre Guillaubey, Jean-Paul Berrod, Isabelle Hubert, Alain M Bron, Catherine P Creuzot-Garcher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To assess the functional and anatomical outcome of primary vitrectomy without scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) in pseudophakic patients and to present the learning curve for this surgery in less experienced surgeons.
METHODS: We reviewed the charts of pseudophakic patients treated with primary vitrectomy without scleral buckling for a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with PVR<C in two academic centres by four surgeons (two more experienced and two less experienced surgeons) for 1 year. The primary endpoint was the reattachment rate with a single procedure by less experienced and more experienced surgeons. Then, to assess the learning curve of this treatment, we compared the results obtained in consecutive pseudophakic patients by less experienced surgeons at the beginning and after a 2-year training period.
RESULTS: First, 133 patient charts with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were included. Retinal reattachment was achieved with a single surgery in 75.2% for all surgeons. This rate was 80.9% for more experienced surgeons compared to 70% for less experienced surgeons (p = 0.37). In another series of 239 patients operated on by less experienced surgeons, the success rate obtained at the beginning of the training period for less experienced surgeons significantly increased after 2 years (from 66.7% to 80%, p < 0.049).
CONCLUSION: Primary vitrectomy without scleral buckling is an effective procedure to treat pseudophakic retinal detachment. Less experienced surgeons need sufficient time to achieve acceptable success rates, reflecting the learning curve for this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19034479     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-008-0997-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  23 in total

1.  Primary pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckle surgery for the treatment of pseudophakic retinal detachment: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Periklis D Brazitikos; Sofia Androudi; William G Christen; Nikolaos Tr Stangos
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Anatomic and visual outcomes of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachment: six-month follow-up results of a single operation--report no. 1.

Authors:  Hamid Ahmadieh; Siamak Moradian; Hooshang Faghihi; Mohammad M Parvaresh; Heshmatollah Ghanbari; Morsal Mehryar; Ebadollah Heidari; Hasan Behboudi; Touka Banaee; Banafsheh Golestan
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Learning curve of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: influence on visual and refractive results.

Authors:  Miguel A Teus; Laura de Benito-Llopis; Jose M Sánchez-Pina
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  The repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Primary vitrectomy for pseudophakic retinal detachment.

Authors:  K U Bartz-Schmidt; B Kirchhof; K Heimann
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Visual acuity after the repair of pseudophakic retinal detachments involving the macula.

Authors:  R D Isernhagen; C P Wilkinson
Journal:  Retina       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: an analysis of 512 cases.

Authors:  Heinrich Heimann; Xiulan Zou; Claudia Jandeck; Ulrich Kellner; Nikolaos E Bechrakis; Klaus-Martin Kreusel; Horst Helbig; Lothar Krause; Andreas Schüler; Norbert Bornfeld; Michael H Foerster
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07-26       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  A predictive model for visual recovery following retinal detachment surgery.

Authors:  T C Burton; R W Lambert
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Retinal detachment after cataract surgery. Predisposing factors.

Authors:  A Yoshida; H Ogasawara; A E Jalkh; R J Sanders; J W McMeel; C L Schepens
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Pars-plana vitrectomy alone vs vitrectomy with scleral buckling for primary rhegmatogenous pseudophakic retinal detachment.

Authors:  Alexandros N Stangos; Ioannis K Petropoulos; Catherine G Brozou; Anastasios D Kapetanios; Andrew Whatham; Constantin J Pournaras
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  10 in total

1.  Intraoperative conversion rate to a large, limbal opening in minimally invasive strabismus surgery (MISS).

Authors:  Marion Kaup; Stefania M Mojon-Azzi; Andrea Kunz; Daniel S Mojon
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Vitreoretinal fellow surgical outcome of small gauge pars plana vitrectomy for acute rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Authors:  Rita Ehrlich; Nadeem Ahmad; Sarah Welch; Peter Hadden; Philip Polkinghorne
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Intraoperative OCT-Assisted Retinal Detachment Repair in the DISCOVER Study: Impact and Outcomes.

Authors:  Joseph R Abraham; Sunil K Srivastava; Thuy K Le; Sumit Sharma; Aleksandra Rachitskaya; Jamie L Reese; Justis P Ehlers
Journal:  Ophthalmol Retina       Date:  2019-11-09

4.  Evaluation of the surgical learning curve for I-125 episcleral plaque placement for the treatment of posterior uveal melanoma: a two decade review.

Authors:  Nisha V Shah; Samuel K Houston; Timothy G Murray; Arnold M Markoe
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03-20

5.  Scleral depressed vitreous shaving, 360 laser, and perfluoropropane (C3 F8) for retinal detachment.

Authors:  Vivek Chaturvedi; Ryan P Basham; Kourous A Rezaei
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Fortified Barrier Laser On The Vitreous Base In Vitrectomy For Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.

Authors:  Sun Ho Park; Sang Cheol Yang; Jae Jung Lee; Hanjo Kwon; Sung Who Park; Ji Eun Lee
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-31

7.  The learning curve of retinal detachment surgery.

Authors:  Viola Radeck; Horst Helbig; Teresa Barth; Maria-Andreea Gamulescu; David Maerker; Philipp Prahs
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  The use of Online Videos for Vitreoretinal Surgery Training: A Comprehensive Analysis.

Authors:  Isil Kutluturk; Veysel Aykut; Ebubekir Durmus
Journal:  Beyoglu Eye J       Date:  2022-02-18

9.  Variations in Functional and Anatomical Outcomes and in Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy Rate along a Prospective Collaborative Study on Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachments: The Retina 1 Project-Report 4.

Authors:  J Carlos Pastor; Itziar Fernández; Rosa M Coco; María R Sanabria; Enrique Rodríguez de la Rúa; Rosa M Piñon; Vicente Martinez; Anna Sala-Puigdollers; José M Gallardo; Sara Velilla
Journal:  ISRN Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-08

10.  Effect of surgeon-related factors on outcome of retinal detachment surgery: analyses of data in Japan-retinal detachment registry.

Authors:  Keita Yamakiri; Taiji Sakamoto; Chihaya Koriyama; Ryo Kawasaki; Takayuki Baba; Koichi Nishitsuka; Takashi Koto; Hiroto Terasaki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.