Literature DB >> 19034302

Ferric gluconate treatment provides cost savings in patients with high ferritin and low transferrin saturation.

Laura T Pizzi1, Thomas J Bunz, Daniel W Coyne, David S Goldfarb, Ajay K Singh.   

Abstract

A subgroup of hemodialysis patients experience high serum ferritin and low tansferrin saturation for reasons not clearly understood. Here we determined the economic impact of administering sodium ferric gluconate complex to patients with serum ferritin levels higher than 500 ng/ml and a transferrin saturation less than 25% based on the Dialysis Patients Response to IV Iron with Elevated Ferritin (DRIVE) study and its extension, DRIVE II. A cost effectiveness model was developed, consistent with the DRIVE studies, using decision analysis with a 12-week time horizon. The primary effectiveness measure was the mean hemoglobin increase in the intent to treat patient groups comparing epoetin with or without sodium ferric gluconate complex. Costs were computed using projected 2007 US Medicare reimbursements for the treatments and for serious adverse events, with the effectiveness factored by the increase in hemoglobin. The net savings for sodium ferric gluconate complex plus epoetin treatment was $1390 compared to epoetin alone for each g/dl hemoglobin increase over 12 weeks of study. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the impact of change in the variables (using medians or means and actual 2005 or projected 2007 Medicare reimbursements) and these affirmed the robustness of the model. Our study shows that treatment of patients with high ferritin and low transferrin saturation levels, as defined in DRIVE, with sodium ferric gluconate complex and epoetin resulted in significant savings compared to epoetin alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19034302     DOI: 10.1038/ki.2008.489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  4 in total

Review 1.  Considerations and challenges in defining optimal iron utilization in hemodialysis.

Authors:  David M Charytan; Amy Barton Pai; Christopher T Chan; Daniel W Coyne; Adriana M Hung; Csaba P Kovesdy; Steven Fishbane
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Effect of Maintenance Intravenous Iron Treatment on Erythropoietin Dose in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Paweena Susantitaphong; Monchai Siribumrungwong; Kullaya Takkavatakarn; Kamonrat Chongthanakorn; Songkiat Lieusuwan; Pisut Katavetin; Khajohn Tiranathanagul; Sookruetai Lekhyananda; Kriang Tungsanga; Supat Vanichakarn; Somchai Eiam-Ong; Kearkiat Praditpornsilpa
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2020-06-19

3.  High dose intravenous iron, mineral homeostasis and intact FGF23 in normal and uremic rats.

Authors:  Eva Gravesen; Jacob Hofman-Bang; Maria L Mace; Ewa Lewin; Klaus Olgaard
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 2.388

4.  The future of intravenous iron in nephrology.

Authors:  Daniel W Coyne
Journal:  NDT Plus       Date:  2011-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.