Literature DB >> 19034160

The role of negative pressure wound therapy with reticulated open cell foam in the treatment of war wounds.

Elisha T Powell1.   

Abstract

The treatment of war wounds poses many unique challenges to all healthcare providers (surgeons, flight medics, nurses, etc.), whether they are located at the far forward trauma hospitals located in or near areas of conflict, at regional hospitals such as Landstuhl Medical Center in Germany, or the larger military hospitals in the United States. These complex wounds often involve massive loss of soft tissue and bone, are contaminated, and are unlike most injuries seen at civilian hospitals. Treatment guidelines, or doctrine, are the result of lessons learned in conflicts over the past few centuries dating back to early 19th century Europe through the Vietnam and recent Persian Gulf war. Advances in surgical and medical treatment have resulted from the complex challenges presented to the war trauma surgeon. More than 1 million patients have been treated for chronic pressure ulcers, abdominal wounds, diabetic ulcers, and acute civilian trauma wounds with negative pressure wound therapy with reticulated open cell foam (NPWT/ROCF) as delivered by V.A.C.(R) Therapy (KCI, San Antonio, TX) for over the past decade. However, the use of NPWT/ROCF for the care of war wounds at battlefield trauma hospitals and/or in the aeromedical evacuation transport system aboard aircraft is a new application of this wound treatment not yet accepted as doctrine. Investigational studies are ongoing to study the safety and efficacy of the treatment of battlefield wounds with NPWT/ROCF both for those national citizens treated at the trauma hospitals in Iraq and Afghanistan and for those wounded American and coalition patients who are transported through the aeromedical transport system to medical centers in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19034160     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318188e27d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  8 in total

Review 1.  Management of combat-related urological trauma in the modern era.

Authors:  Molly Williams; James Jezior
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Clinical evaluation of improvised gauze-based negative pressure wound therapy in military wounds.

Authors:  Junaid Mansoor; Irfan Ellahi; Zartash Junaid; Adeel Habib; Uzair Ilyas
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Negative pressure wound therapy in acute, contaminated wounds: documenting its safety and efficacy to support current global practice.

Authors:  Ehyal Shweiki; Kathy E Gallagher
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 4.  Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in the Management of Combat Wounds: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Sanjay Maurya; Prem Singh Bhandari
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Negative pressure wound therapy: experience in 45 dogs.

Authors:  Kathryn A Pitt; Bryden J Stanley
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 1.495

6.  Use of topical negative pressure in british servicemen with combat wounds.

Authors:  Jowan G Penn-Barwell; C Anton Fries; Lesley Street; Steven Jeffery
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2011-08-19

7.  Vacuum-assisted closure of perineal war wound related to rectum.

Authors:  Nazim Gümüş
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2009-11-13

8.  Negative pressure wound therapy in the management of mine blast injuries of lower limbs: Lessons learnt at a tertiary care center.

Authors:  Sanjay Maurya; N Srinath; P S Bhandari
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2016-07-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.