Literature DB >> 1903372

The role of uncertainty analysis in treatment planning.

M M Urie1, M Goitein, K Doppke, J G Kutcher, T LoSasso, R Mohan, J E Munzenrider, M Sontag, J W Wong.   

Abstract

The role of uncertainty analysis in 3-D treatment planning systems was addressed by four institutions which contracted with NCI to evaluate high energy photon external beam treatment planning. Treatment plans were developed at eight disease sites and the effects of uncertainties assessed in a number of experiments. Uncertainties which are patient-site specific included variations in the delineation of target volumes and normal tissues and the effects of positional uncertainties due to physiological motion and setup nonreproducibility. These were found to have a potentially major impact on the doses to the target volumes and to critical normal tissues which could result in significantly altered probabilities of tumor control and normal tissue complications. Other uncertainties, such as the conversion of CT data to electron densities, heterogeneities and dose calculation algorithms' weaknesses, are related to physical processes. The latter was noted to have the greatest potential contribution to uncertainty in some sites. A third category of uncertainty related to the treatment machine, the consequences of compensator misregistration, are exclusive to the site and the treatment portal. Because conventional treatment planning systems have not incorporated uncertainty analysis, tools and techniques had to be devised for this work; further development in this area is needed. Many of the analyses could not have been done without full 3-D capabilities of the planning systems, and it can be anticipated that the availability of uncertainty analysis in these systems which allow nontraditional beam arrangements will be of great value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1903372     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90170-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  7 in total

1.  A gradient-based method for segmenting FDG-PET images: methodology and validation.

Authors:  Xavier Geets; John A Lee; Anne Bol; Max Lonneux; Vincent Grégoire
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Intensity modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  H M Kooy; C Grassberger
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Adaptive radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michel Ghilezan; Di Yan; Alvaro Martinez
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.934

4.  Extracting fuzzy classification rules from texture segmented HRCT lung images.

Authors:  Manish Kakar; Arianna Mencattini; Marcello Salmeri
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  [Contrast-enhanced MR "magnetization transfer technique". Improved tumor contrast, delineation and visibility of intracranial malignant gliomas and metastases in radiosurgical treatment planning].

Authors:  H Hawighorst; W Schreiber; J Debus; M V Knopp; R Engenhart-Cabillic; G Brix; M Essig; G van Kaick
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 6.  Proton therapy - Present and future.

Authors:  Radhe Mohan; David Grosshans
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 15.470

7.  Variations in CT determination of target volume with active breath co-ordinate in radiotherapy for post-operative gastric cancer.

Authors:  Gui-Chao Li; Zhen Zhang; Xue-Jun Ma; Xiao-Li Yu; Wei-Gang Hu; Jia-Zhou Wang; Qi-Wen Li; Li-Ping Liang; Li-Jun Shen; Hui Zhang; Ming Fan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.039

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.