Literature DB >> 19033569

A tracking and feedback registry to reduce racial disparities in breast cancer care.

Nina A Bickell1, Kruti Shastri, Kezhen Fei, Soji Oluwole, Henry Godfrey, Karen Hiotis, Anitha Srinivasan, Amber A Guth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Black and Hispanic women with early-stage breast cancer are more likely than white women to experience fragmented care and less likely to see medical oncologists to get effective adjuvant treatment. We implemented a tracking and feedback registry to close the referral loop between surgeons and oncologists.
METHODS: We compared completed oncology consultations and use of adjuvant treatment among a group of 639 women with newly diagnosed stage I or II breast cancer who had undergone surgery at one of six New York City hospitals from 1999 to 2000 with the same outcomes for a different group of 300 women with breast cancer whose surgeries occurred in 2004-2006, after the implementation of the tracking registry. Underuse of adjuvant treatment was defined as no radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery, no chemotherapy for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors, or no hormonal therapy for ER-positive tumors 1 cm or larger. We used hierarchical modeling to adjust for clustering within hospital and surgeon practice. Odds ratios were converted to adjusted relative risks (aRRs). All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: Implementation of the tracking and feedback registry was accompanied by a statistically significant increase in oncology consultations (83% before vs 97% after the intervention; difference = 14%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 11% to 18%; P < .001) and decrease in underuse of adjuvant treatment (23% before vs 14% after the intervention; difference = -9%, 95% CI = -12% to -6%; P < .001). Underuse declined from 34% to 14% among black women, from 23% to 13% among Hispanic women, and from 17% to 14% among white women (chi-square of change in underuse from before to after among the three racial groups; P = .001). In multivariable models adjusting for clustering by hospital and surgeon, the intervention was associated with increased rates of oncology consultation (aRR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.3 to 1.8), and reduced underuse of adjuvant treatment (aRR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.6 to 0.9). Compared with the preintervention findings, minority race was no longer a risk factor for low rates of oncology consultation (aRR = 1.0, 95% CI = 0.7 to 1.3) or for underuse of adjuvant therapy (aRR = 1.0, 95% CI = 0.8 to 1.3).
CONCLUSIONS: A tracking and feedback registry that enhances completed oncology consultations between surgeons and oncologists also appears to reduce rates of adjuvant treatment underuse and to eliminate the racial disparity in treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19033569      PMCID: PMC2727139          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djn387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  28 in total

1.  Primary care physicians who treat blacks and whites.

Authors:  Peter B Bach; Hoangmai H Pham; Deborah Schrag; Ramsey C Tate; J Lee Hargraves
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Computer technology and clinical work: still waiting for Godot.

Authors:  Robert L Wears; Marc Berg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer stage, treatment, and survival in the United States.

Authors:  Christopher I Li
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.847

4.  Racial/ethnic inequities in continuity and site of care: location, location, location.

Authors:  M P Doescher; B G Saver; K Fiscella; P Franks
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Care in U.S. hospitals--the Hospital Quality Alliance program.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; Zhonghe Li; E John Orav; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment.

Authors:  Brenda K Edwards; Martin L Brown; Phyllis A Wingo; Holly L Howe; Elizabeth Ward; Lynn A G Ries; Deborah Schrag; Patricia M Jamison; Ahmedin Jemal; Xiao Cheng Wu; Carol Friedman; Linda Harlan; Joan Warren; Robert N Anderson; Linda W Pickle
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes.

Authors:  J Zhang; K F Yu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-18       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

9.  Racial disparities in treatment and survival among women with early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Dawn Hershman; Russell McBride; Judith S Jacobson; Lois Lamerato; Kevin Roberts; Victor R Grann; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Factors related to underuse of surveillance mammography among breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Mary Beth Landrum; Edward Guadagnoli; Eric P Winer; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  United States trends in the surgical treatment of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Todd M Tuttle; Natasha M Rueth; Andrea Abbott; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Commentary: "help the doctor"-the culture shift to 21st century care management.

Authors:  Stephen B Edge
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Patient and provider perspectives on delivery of oral cancer therapies.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Simon J Craddock Lee; David E Gerber; John V Cox; Hannah M Fullington; Robin T Higashi
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2019-06-20

4.  The challenge of quality in breast care: beyond accreditation.

Authors:  Stephen B Edge
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Physician clinical information technology and health care disparities.

Authors:  Jonathan D Ketcham; Karen E Lutfey; Eric Gerstenberger; Carol L Link; John B McKinlay
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 3.929

6.  Supporting Latina Breast Health with Community-based Navigation.

Authors:  Jennifer D Keith; Nichole E Kang; MatheRose Bodden; Christina Miller; Vanesa Karamanian; Tinesha Banks
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Racial Disparities in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Treatment: The Potential Health Information Technology Offers.

Authors:  Nina A Bickell; Jenny J Lin; Sarah R Abramson; Gerald P Hoke; William Oh; Simon J Hall; Richard Stock; Kezhen Fei; Ann Scheck McAlearney
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Eliminating disparities in cancer screening and follow-up of abnormal results: what will it take?

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Sharon Humiston; Samantha Hendren; Paul Winters; Pascal Jean-Pierre; Amna Idris; Patricia Ford
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2011-02

9.  Underuse of breast cancer adjuvant treatment: patient knowledge, beliefs, and medical mistrust.

Authors:  Nina A Bickell; Jessica Weidmann; Kezhen Fei; Jenny J Lin; Howard Leventhal
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Delayed radiotherapy for breast cancer patients in integrated delivery systems.

Authors:  Heather Taffet Gold; Soe Soe Thwin; Diana S M Buist; Terry S Field; Feifei Wei; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Timothy L Lash; Virginia P Quinn; Ann M Geiger; Rebecca A Silliman
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.