Literature DB >> 19033153

Recombination load in a chromosomal inversion polymorphism of Drosophila subobscura.

Mauro Santos1.   

Abstract

Chromosomal inversions suppress recombination in heterokaryotypes and may help to maintain positive epistatic interactions among groups of alleles at loci contained in the inversion. Here I evaluate the protective effect of inversions on recombination when different chromosomal segments, or even the whole chromosome O of Drosophila subobscura, can be effectively prevented from undergoing recombination in several naturally occurring heterokaryotypes. The fitness of flies made homozygous for recombinant chromosomes was generally lower when compared to their nonrecombinant counterparts, thus suggesting that segregating gene arrangements in this species hold together favorable combinations of alleles that interact epistatically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19033153      PMCID: PMC2644967          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.097857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  22 in total

1.  Fitness of karyotypes in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  M Wasserman; H R Koepfer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The Effects of Recombination on Quasinormal Second and Third Chromosomes of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER from a Natural Population.

Authors:  A C Allen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Release of Genetic Variability through Recombination. III. Drosophila Prosaltans.

Authors:  T Dobzhansky; H Levene; B Spassky; N Spassky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1959-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Release of Genetic Variability through Recombination. I. Drosophila Pseudoobscura.

Authors:  B Spassky; N Spassky; H Levene; T Dobzhansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1958-09       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Nick Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genetic variation in a modifier system affecting the expression of bare mutant of Drosophila subobscura.

Authors:  G Alvarez; P Martínez; C Zapata
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Genetic Coadaptation in the Chromosomal Polymorphism of DROSOPHILA SUBOBSCURA. I. Seasonal Changes of Gametic Disequilibrium in a Natural Population.

Authors:  A Fontdevila; C Zapata; G Alvarez; L Sanchez; J Méndez; I Enriquez
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  An experimental on recombination load in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; D Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Factors influencing fitness in chromosomal strains in Drosophila subobscura.

Authors:  M Wasserman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Seasonal cycles of allozyme-by-chromosomal-inversion gametic disequilibrium in Drosophila subobscura.

Authors:  Francisco Rodríguez-Trelles
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  6 in total

1.  Dobzhansky's concept of genetic coadaptation: Drosophila ananassae is an exception to this concept.

Authors:  Bashisth N Singh
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  The genetic content of chromosomal inversions across a wide latitudinal gradient.

Authors:  Pedro Simões; Gemma Calabria; João Picão-Osório; Joan Balanyà; Marta Pascual
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Heterozygosity maintains developmental stability of sternopleural bristles in Drosophila subobscura interpopulation hybrids.

Authors:  Zorana Kurbalija Novicic; Marina Stamenkovic-Radak; Cino Pertoldi; Mihailo Jelic; Marija Savic Veselinovic; Marko Andjelkovic
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.857

4.  Adaptive Role of Inversion Polymorphism of Drosophila subobscura in Lead Stressed Environment.

Authors:  Bojan Kenig; Zorana Kurbalija Novičić; Aleksandra Patenković; Marina Stamenković-Radak; Marko Anđelković
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Predictable phenotypic, but not karyotypic, evolution of populations with contrasting initial history.

Authors:  Pedro Simões; Inês Fragata; Sofia G Seabra; Gonçalo S Faria; Marta A Santos; Michael R Rose; Mauro Santos; Margarida Matos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Basal hsp70 expression levels do not explain adaptive variation of the warm- and cold-climate O3 + 4 + 7 and OST gene arrangements of Drosophila subobscura.

Authors:  Marta Puig Giribets; Mauro Santos; María Pilar García Guerreiro
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.260

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.