OBJECTIVE: To determine the technical applicability and early postoperative outcome of anterior sagittal approach for anorectal malformations in female children. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Surgical Unit B of National Institute of Child Health (NICH), Karachi, from April to November 2007. METHODOLOGY: Female patients with congenital anorectal malformation who underwent anorectoplasty through anterior sagittal approach were included in the study. Surgery was done either as primary or staged procedure (with initial colostomy or cut back). Operative details were recorded. Follow-up was done in OPD. RESULTS: Thirty patients with mean age of 11.5 months underwent anorectoplasty through anterior sagittal approach. Eighteen patients had ASARP as a primary procedure. Staged procedure with initial colostomy was done in 9 patients. Initial cut back was done in 2 cases and one redo surgery done. Vaginal tear occurred in one, while partial tear of most distal part of fistula occurred in 4 children. At follow-up, 2 patients with primary ASARP developed wound infection with superficial disruption. Bleeding with wound disruption occurred in one case. Anal mucosal prolapse, anastomotic stricture and recurrent fistula occurred in one patient each. Cosmetic appearance of perineum was good in 10, satisfactory in 5 and poor in 3. Among patients staged with colostomy, bleeding with wound disruption, anal stenosis and retraction occurred in one case each. Cosmetic results were good in 7, satisfactory and poor in one case each. Two patients with initial cut back did not have any complication and one operated for disrupted wound developed disruption again. CONCLUSION: Anorectoplasty can satisfactorily be done through anterior sagittal approach in females with anorectal malformations. Primary ASARP has almost the same results as staged procedure, which should be done in selected patients.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the technical applicability and early postoperative outcome of anterior sagittal approach for anorectal malformations in female children. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Surgical Unit B of National Institute of Child Health (NICH), Karachi, from April to November 2007. METHODOLOGY: Female patients with congenital anorectal malformation who underwent anorectoplasty through anterior sagittal approach were included in the study. Surgery was done either as primary or staged procedure (with initial colostomy or cut back). Operative details were recorded. Follow-up was done in OPD. RESULTS: Thirty patients with mean age of 11.5 months underwent anorectoplasty through anterior sagittal approach. Eighteen patients had ASARP as a primary procedure. Staged procedure with initial colostomy was done in 9 patients. Initial cut back was done in 2 cases and one redo surgery done. Vaginal tear occurred in one, while partial tear of most distal part of fistula occurred in 4 children. At follow-up, 2 patients with primary ASARP developed wound infection with superficial disruption. Bleeding with wound disruption occurred in one case. Anal mucosal prolapse, anastomotic stricture and recurrent fistula occurred in one patient each. Cosmetic appearance of perineum was good in 10, satisfactory in 5 and poor in 3. Among patients staged with colostomy, bleeding with wound disruption, anal stenosis and retraction occurred in one case each. Cosmetic results were good in 7, satisfactory and poor in one case each. Two patients with initial cut back did not have any complication and one operated for disrupted wound developed disruption again. CONCLUSION: Anorectoplasty can satisfactorily be done through anterior sagittal approach in females with anorectal malformations. Primary ASARP has almost the same results as staged procedure, which should be done in selected patients.