OBJECTIVES: Postmortem human brain is a valuable resource for studying the neuropathology, neurochemistry, and molecular pathways of genes associated with bipolar disorder (BPD), yet available, well-characterized BPD brain tissue appears scarce. We set out to evaluate BPD postmortem brain collections in order to identify both successful methods as well as barriers to collection. METHODS: We conducted a literature review of postmortem studies of BPD over the past 30 years, compared and contrasted characteristics of established BPD collections, and identified possible barriers specific to BPD brain collection based on our experience at the NIMH Brain Collection. RESULTS: Currently, 80% of postmortem BPD studies were derived from just two brain repositories worldwide: the Stanley Brain Collection (69%) and Harvard Brain Tissue Resource Center (HBTRC) (11%) (combined subjects n = 72). The NIMH Brain Collection collected BPD cases four times less frequently than cases with schizophrenia, despite similar prevalence rates for these disorders. Only 53% of cases referred to the NIMH collection as BPD met DSM-IV criteria, with inadequate documentation and comorbid substance abuse as primary confounds for diagnosis in the remaining 47% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate identification and diagnosis of BPD is a central obstacle to BPD brain collection. Comorbid substance abuse and manner of death are two of many critical factors to consider in BPD postmortem studies. Difficulties in BPD brain collection, coupled with the cessation of brain collection by the Stanley Brain Collection, make the need for alternative BPD brain sources imperative. Recommendations for future BPD tissue collection are offered.
OBJECTIVES: Postmortem human brain is a valuable resource for studying the neuropathology, neurochemistry, and molecular pathways of genes associated with bipolar disorder (BPD), yet available, well-characterized BPD brain tissue appears scarce. We set out to evaluate BPD postmortem brain collections in order to identify both successful methods as well as barriers to collection. METHODS: We conducted a literature review of postmortem studies of BPD over the past 30 years, compared and contrasted characteristics of established BPD collections, and identified possible barriers specific to BPD brain collection based on our experience at the NIMH Brain Collection. RESULTS: Currently, 80% of postmortem BPD studies were derived from just two brain repositories worldwide: the Stanley Brain Collection (69%) and Harvard Brain Tissue Resource Center (HBTRC) (11%) (combined subjects n = 72). The NIMH Brain Collection collected BPD cases four times less frequently than cases with schizophrenia, despite similar prevalence rates for these disorders. Only 53% of cases referred to the NIMH collection as BPD met DSM-IV criteria, with inadequate documentation and comorbid substance abuse as primary confounds for diagnosis in the remaining 47% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate identification and diagnosis of BPD is a central obstacle to BPD brain collection. Comorbid substance abuse and manner of death are two of many critical factors to consider in BPD postmortem studies. Difficulties in BPD brain collection, coupled with the cessation of brain collection by the Stanley Brain Collection, make the need for alternative BPD brain sources imperative. Recommendations for future BPD tissue collection are offered.
Authors: N Uranova; D Orlovskaya; O Vikhreva; I Zimina; N Kolomeets; V Vostrikov; V Rachmanova Journal: Brain Res Bull Date: 2001-07-15 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: B Baumann; P Danos; S Diekmann; D Krell; H Bielau; C Geretsegger; C Wurthmann; H G Bernstein; B Bogerts Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 1999 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: John F McCarthy; Frederic C Blow; Marcia Valenstein; Ellen P Fischer; Richard R Owen; Kristen L Barry; Teresa J Hudson; Rosalinda V Ignacio Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Rodrigo Machado-Vieira; Marcio G Soeiro-De-Souza; Erica M Richards; Antonio L Teixeira; Carlos A Zarate Journal: World J Biol Psychiatry Date: 2013-09-02 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Edwin J C G van den Oord; Shaunna L Clark; Lin Ying Xie; Andrey A Shabalin; Mikhail G Dozmorov; Gaurav Kumar; Vladimir I Vladimirov; Patrik K E Magnusson; Karolina A Aberg Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2015-12-09 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Chansoo Jun; Yera Choi; Soo Mee Lim; Sujin Bae; Young Sun Hong; Jieun E Kim; In Kyoon Lyoo Journal: Exp Neurobiol Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 3.261
Authors: Karolina A Aberg; Brian Dean; Andrey A Shabalin; Robin F Chan; Laura K M Han; Min Zhao; Gerard van Grootheest; Lin Y Xie; Yuri Milaneschi; Shaunna L Clark; Gustavo Turecki; Brenda W J H Penninx; Edwin J C G van den Oord Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2018-09-21 Impact factor: 15.992