Literature DB >> 19032659

Models of antenatal care and obstetric outcomes in Sydney South West.

Jun Bai1, Rajanishwar Gyaneshwar, Adrian Bauman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess obstetric outcomes of different models of antenatal care.
METHODS: The study was historical cohort analysis of population birth data of 67,675 singleton births delivered in all public hospitals in Sydney South-west. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared for different models of antenatal care received. The care was provided within the hospitals in doctor's clinic, midwives' clinic, birth centre, or by a team of midwives in the caseload midwifery. In the non-hospital settings, the care was provided by private obstetricians or by the general practitioner (GP) as part of the GP Shared Care program. The data for those women who received no antenatal care were also analysed.
RESULTS: This study provided information that the obstetric outcomes were very similar regardless of whether a woman received her antenatal care in the midwives' clinic, the birth centre, under the GP Shared Care program or in the doctor's clinic in Sydney South-west hospitals.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence for the view that different models of maternity care can be provided with good outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19032659     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00888.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  8 in total

1.  Assessing the effect on outcomes of public or private provision of prenatal care in Portugal.

Authors:  Sofia Correia; Teresa Rodrigues; Henrique Barros
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-07

2.  Does the organizational model of the maternity health clinic have an influence on women's and their partners' experiences? A service evaluation survey in Southwest Finland.

Authors:  Miia Tuominen; Anne Kaljonen; Pia Ahonen; Päivi Rautava
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Patients' perceptions of safety and quality of maternity clinical handover.

Authors:  Georgiana S M Chin; Narelle Warren; Louise Kornman; Peter Cameron
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Caseload midwifery as organisational change: the interplay between professional and organisational projects in Denmark.

Authors:  Viola Burau; Charlotte Overgaard
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  A Comparison of Medical Birth Register Outcomes between Maternity Health Clinics and Integrated Maternity and Child Health Clinics in Southwest Finland.

Authors:  Miia Tuominen; Anne Kaljonen; Pia Ahonen; Juha Mäkinen; Päivi Rautava
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 5.120

6.  Normal birth in Kazakhstan: Labor management practice in accordance with World Health Organization's recommendations.

Authors:  Aizhan D Kyzayeva; Aigul B Kudamanova
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Supporting healthy pregnancies: Examining variations in nutrition, weight management and substance abuse advice provision by prenatal care providers in Alberta, Canada. A study using the All Our Families cohort.

Authors:  Shainur Premji; Sheila W McDonald; Carol Zaychkowsky; Jennifer D Zwicker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Impact of prenatal care provider on the use of ancillary health services during pregnancy.

Authors:  Amy Metcalfe; Kristen Grabowska; Carol Weller; Suzanne C Tough
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.