Qi-min Ge1, Fu-qiang Zhang. 1. Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200011, China
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the limitation of currently used shade guide systems comparing with color range of nature teeth. METHODS: Digital pictures of shade guide systems A (VITAPAN Classic), B (VINTAGE Halo), C (3D-MASTER), and 322 central incisors were taken under the same condition as light source of D65 with the observation method of d/0 degrees. The data obtained from nature tooth color were compared with the color range of three shade guide systems mentioned above in items of L * a * b */C * H degrees. RESULTS: The normal chroma value (95%) of the natural teeth were L* 61.631-73.250, a * -0.719-1.879, and b * 8.701-17.790. Natural tooth colors were different from those of the shade guide system A which color range was narrower, short of red hue, higher values, and unevenly distribution of saturation. On the other hand, the range of red hue increased in shade guide system B while its saturation was slightly high. The color range of shade guide system C was greatest among the three shade guide systems. The saturation and value of shade guide system C covered all varieties of nature teeth measured in this research, but it still lacked red hue comparing to the nature teeth. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing the color range of nature teeth, the shade guide systems used in clinic have uneven hue distribution and cannot cover all colors of nature teeth. Generally, all the shade guide systems are lack of the hues which are named under the category of red tone.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the limitation of currently used shade guide systems comparing with color range of nature teeth. METHODS: Digital pictures of shade guide systems A (VITAPAN Classic), B (VINTAGE Halo), C (3D-MASTER), and 322 central incisors were taken under the same condition as light source of D65 with the observation method of d/0 degrees. The data obtained from nature tooth color were compared with the color range of three shade guide systems mentioned above in items of L * a * b */C * H degrees. RESULTS: The normal chroma value (95%) of the natural teeth were L* 61.631-73.250, a * -0.719-1.879, and b * 8.701-17.790. Natural tooth colors were different from those of the shade guide system A which color range was narrower, short of red hue, higher values, and unevenly distribution of saturation. On the other hand, the range of red hue increased in shade guide system B while its saturation was slightly high. The color range of shade guide system C was greatest among the three shade guide systems. The saturation and value of shade guide system C covered all varieties of nature teeth measured in this research, but it still lacked red hue comparing to the nature teeth. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing the color range of nature teeth, the shade guide systems used in clinic have uneven hue distribution and cannot cover all colors of nature teeth. Generally, all the shade guide systems are lack of the hues which are named under the category of red tone.
Authors: Cristina Gómez Polo; Miguel Gómez Polo; Javier Montero; Juan Antonio Martínez Vazquez De Parga; Alicia Celemin Viñuela Journal: Int Dent J Date: 2015-07-27 Impact factor: 2.607