PURPOSE: We have been developing a computer-aided detection (CAD) system for lung nodules on multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT). The scheme for nodule detection in this system is featured by three-dimensional analysis of nodule candidates [corrected] and their surroundings, which is designed to discriminate nodules from blood vessels. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the CAD system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MDCT images from 30 patients with lung nodules were read twice, 3 weeks apart by a chest radiologist to detect noncalcified nodules of > or = 4 mm. The first reading was without CAD, and the second reading was with CAD. Based on the reference standard later determined by another chest radiologist, the sensitivity of the former chest radiologist without or with CAD was obtained; the sensitivity and false-positive rate of the system alone were also obtained. RESULTS: The reference standard consisted of 66 nodules. The sensitivity of the chest radiologist was 77% (51/66) without CAD and 91% (60/66) with CAD, showing a significant improvement. The CAD system alone showed a sensitivity of 79% (52/66) with the false-positive rate of 4.5 per patient. CONCLUSION: Although preliminary, these results indicate the efficacy of the CAD system.
PURPOSE: We have been developing a computer-aided detection (CAD) system for lung nodules on multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT). The scheme for nodule detection in this system is featured by three-dimensional analysis of nodule candidates [corrected] and their surroundings, which is designed to discriminate nodules from blood vessels. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the CAD system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MDCT images from 30 patients with lung nodules were read twice, 3 weeks apart by a chest radiologist to detect noncalcified nodules of > or = 4 mm. The first reading was without CAD, and the second reading was with CAD. Based on the reference standard later determined by another chest radiologist, the sensitivity of the former chest radiologist without or with CAD was obtained; the sensitivity and false-positive rate of the system alone were also obtained. RESULTS: The reference standard consisted of 66 nodules. The sensitivity of the chest radiologist was 77% (51/66) without CAD and 91% (60/66) with CAD, showing a significant improvement. The CAD system alone showed a sensitivity of 79% (52/66) with the false-positive rate of 4.5 per patient. CONCLUSION: Although preliminary, these results indicate the efficacy of the CAD system.
Authors: Matthew S Brown; Jonathan G Goldin; Robert D Suh; Michael F McNitt-Gray; James W Sayre; Denise R Aberle Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: K Kanazawa; Y Kawata; N Niki; H Satoh; H Ohmatsu; R Kakinuma; M Kaneko; N Moriyama; K Eguchi Journal: Comput Med Imaging Graph Date: 1998 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.790
Authors: J H Austin; N L Müller; P J Friedman; D M Hansell; D P Naidich; M Remy-Jardin; W R Webb; E A Zerhouni Journal: Radiology Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: E Lopez Torres; E Fiorina; F Pennazio; C Peroni; M Saletta; N Camarlinghi; M E Fantacci; P Cerello Journal: Med Phys Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.071