Literature DB >> 19030912

Postconditioning cardioprotection against infarct size and post-ischemic systolic dysfunction is influenced by gender.

Claudia Penna1, Francesca Tullio, Annalisa Merlino, Francesca Moro, Stefania Raimondo, Raffaella Rastaldo, Maria-Giulia Perrelli, Daniele Mancardi, Pasquale Pagliaro.   

Abstract

Whether cardioprotection by postconditioning (PostC) is gender dependent is not clear. We studied the effect of PostC in terms of both infarct size (IS) and post-ischemic systolic dysfunction (PSD) reduction. Isolated male and female rat hearts were subjected to 10- or 30-min of global ischemia and 120-min of reperfusion, with or without PostC (i.e., 5 cycles of 10-s reperfusion/ischemia immediately after the ischemia). Surprisingly, after 10-min ischemia, IS and PSD were greater in female than male hearts (IS: 21 +/- 2% Vs. 11 +/- 2%; P < 0.01), while PostC attenuated IS and PSD in female hearts only. After 30-min ischemia IS was smaller in female than male hearts (52 +/- 2% Vs. 61 +/- 3%; P < 0.05), whereas PSD was similar in these two groups. PostC reduced IS in both genders, though the effect was smaller (P < 0.05) in females. Yet, PostC reduced PSD in female, but not in male hearts. Contracture development paralleled IS in all groups. To check the effects of buffer perfusion over heart function, additional hearts underwent 150-min buffer perfusion only. Contractile function of these hearts was not significantly affected over time. In conclusion IS, contracture and PSD are differently affected by gender, depending on ischemia duration. Yet, reduction of IS induced by PostC depends on the extension of IS induced by index-ischemia. While in female hearts reduction of PSD paralleled IS reduction, in male it does not occur. Results suggest that improvement of systolic function is mainly due to the anti-necrotic rather than to the anti-stunning effect exerted by PostC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19030912     DOI: 10.1007/s00395-008-0762-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol        ISSN: 0300-8428            Impact factor:   17.165


  28 in total

1.  The clinical impact of sex differences on ischemic postconditioning during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a POST (the effects of postconditioning on myocardial reperfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) substudy.

Authors:  Eun-Seok Shin; Ju-Hyun Chung; Joo-Yong Hahn; Young Bin Song; Eun Kyoung Kim; Cheol Woong Yu; Jang-Whan Bae; Woo-Young Chung; Seung-Hyuk Choi; Jin-Ho Choi; Jang-Ho Bae; Kyung Joo An; Jong-Seon Park; Ju Hyeon Oh; Sang-Wook Kim; Jin-Yong Hwang; Jae Kean Ryu; Scot Garg; Do-Sun Lim; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon; Hun Sik Park
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Practical guidelines for rigor and reproducibility in preclinical and clinical studies on cardioprotection.

Authors:  Hans Erik Bøtker; Derek Hausenloy; Ioanna Andreadou; Salvatore Antonucci; Kerstin Boengler; Sean M Davidson; Soni Deshwal; Yvan Devaux; Fabio Di Lisa; Moises Di Sante; Panagiotis Efentakis; Saveria Femminò; David García-Dorado; Zoltán Giricz; Borja Ibanez; Efstathios Iliodromitis; Nina Kaludercic; Petra Kleinbongard; Markus Neuhäuser; Michel Ovize; Pasquale Pagliaro; Michael Rahbek-Schmidt; Marisol Ruiz-Meana; Klaus-Dieter Schlüter; Rainer Schulz; Andreas Skyschally; Catherine Wilder; Derek M Yellon; Peter Ferdinandy; Gerd Heusch
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 17.165

3.  Cardioprotection with postconditioning: loss of efficacy in murine models of type-2 and type-1 diabetes.

Authors:  Karin Przyklenk; Michelle Maynard; Dale L Greiner; Peter Whittaker
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 8.401

4.  Pacing postconditioning: impact of pacing algorithm, gender, and diabetes on its myocardial protective effects.

Authors:  Fawzi A Babiker; Jolanda van Golde; Ward Y Vanagt; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 5.  The role of comorbidities in cardioprotection.

Authors:  Michael N Sack; Elizabeth Murphy
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 2.457

6.  Endothelial NOS activity and myocardial oxygen metabolism define the salvageable ischemic time window for ischemic postconditioning.

Authors:  Ming Cai; Yuanjing Li; Yi Xu; Harold M Swartz; Chwen-Lih Chen; Yeong-Renn Chen; Guanglong He
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 4.733

7.  Ischemic postconditioning does not provide cardioprotection from long-term ischemic injury in isolated male or female rat hearts.

Authors:  Daniel S Lee; Gregory E Steinbaugh; Ricardo Quarrie; Fuchun Yang; M A Hassan Talukder; Jay L Zweier; Juan A Crestanello
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2010-09-26       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Effective neuroprotection by ischemic postconditioning is associated with a decreased expression of RGMa and inflammation mediators in ischemic rats.

Authors:  Yuhan Kong; Mary R Rogers; Xinyue Qin
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.996

9.  Ticagrelor Conditioning Effects Are Not Additive to Cardioprotection Induced by Direct NLRP3 Inflammasome Inhibition: Role of RISK, NLRP3, and Redox Cascades.

Authors:  Claudia Penna; Manuela Aragno; Alessia Sofia Cento; Saveria Femminò; Isabella Russo; Federica Dal Bello; Fausto Chiazza; Debora Collotta; Gustavo Ferreira Alves; Massimo Bertinaria; Elisa Zicola; Valentina Mercurio; Claudio Medana; Massimo Collino; Pasquale Pagliaro
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 6.543

10.  pGlu-serpinin protects the normotensive and hypertensive heart from ischemic injury.

Authors:  T Pasqua; B Tota; C Penna; A Corti; M C Cerra; P Loh Y; T Angelone
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 4.286

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.