Literature DB >> 19028860

Factors associated with fatigued, injured, and dead pig frequency during transport and lairage at a commercial abattoir.

R F Fitzgerald1, K J Stalder, J O Matthews, C M Schultz Kaster, A K Johnson.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify environmental and management factors that are associated with the frequency of fatigued, injured, and dead pigs on arrival and in resting pens during lairage at a commercial Midwest abattoir. The terms transport losses or total losses refer to pigs that die or become nonambulatory at any stage of the marketing process. In this study, fatigued, injured, and dead pigs were summed into a variable termed total losses. Relative humidity (%), temperature ( degrees C), wind speed (m/s), and dew point ( degrees C) data were collected on 12,333 trailer loads of pigs. Week, sort from barn (first or third pig removal from barn), farm, normal vs. split load type (from 1 or multiple barns), load crew, driver, trailer, and wind direction were used as fixed effects in the model for the analysis of losses per load using generalized mixed models for Poisson distributions. Seven temperature-humidity indices (THI) were calculated and compared as model covariates. Load time per pig, trailer density (pigs per trailer x average BW/trailer space; kg/m(2)), wait time before unloading at the abattoir, and wind speed were used as model covariates. The log of the number of hogs per trailer was used to standardize the response variable. The linear covariate density accounted for the greatest portion of variance (based on F-value) followed by the fixed effect sort from barn, the fixed effect load type (pigs from 1 or multiple barns within a farm), load time per pig linear covariate, and THI. Pigs transported to the abattoir from June through July experienced fewer losses (P < 0.001) when compared with pigs that were transported from November through December. Keeping other factors constant, the log of total losses (%) per load increased by 0.0102x + 0.000541x(2) per unit of THI and 0.0191 kg/m(2) of density. Similarly, of 9 farms, the poorest-performing farm in regards to total loss percentage experienced 0.93% more losses per load when compared with the farm with the least loss percentage. This study demonstrates that multiple environment and management factors influence the incidence of market hog transport losses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19028860     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2008-1270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  16 in total

1.  Assessment of thermal load on transported goats administered with ascorbic acid during the hot-dry conditions.

Authors:  N S Minka; J O Ayo
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Preslaughter handling practices and their effects on animal welfare and pork quality.

Authors:  Luigi Faucitano
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Swine veterinarians are a vital resource for minimizing the incidence of stressed pigs during transport.

Authors:  Gord Doonan; Geneviève Benard; Nicole Cormier
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.008

4.  Generalized additive mixed model on the analysis of total transport losses of market-weight pigs1.

Authors:  Tiago L Passafaro; Denise Van de Stroet; Nora M Bello; Noel H Williams; Guilherme J M Rosa
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Behavior, blood stress indicators, skin lesions, and meat quality in pigs transported to slaughter at different loading densities.

Authors:  Valentina Montoya Urrea; Ana Maria Bridi; Maria Camila Ceballos; Mateus J R Paranhos da Costa; Luigi Faucitano
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Measurement of the three-axis vibration, temperature, and relative humidity profiles of commercial transport trailers for pigs.

Authors:  Benjamin K Morris; R Benjamin Davis; Edwin Brokesh; Daniel K Flippo; Terry A Houser; Francisco Najar-Villarreal; Kari K Turner; Jamison G Williams; Alexander M Stelzleni; John M Gonzalez
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 7.  Effects of Transport at Weaning on the Behavior, Physiology and Performance of Pigs.

Authors:  Mhairi A Sutherland; Brittany L Backus; John J McGlone
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Establishing Sprinkling Requirements on Trailers Transporting Market Weight Pigs in Warm and Hot Weather.

Authors:  Rebecca Kephart; Anna Johnson; Avi Sapkota; Kenneth Stalder; John McGlone
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Establishing Bedding Requirements during Transport and Monitoring Skin Temperature during Cold and Mild Seasons after Transport for Finishing Pigs.

Authors:  John McGlone; Anna Johnson; Avi Sapkota; Rebecca Kephart
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Characteristics of Trailer Thermal Environment during Commercial Swine Transport Managed under U.S. Industry Guidelines.

Authors:  Yijie Xiong; Angela Green; Richard S Gates
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.